首页> 外文期刊>Operational Research >Integrated modelling of payment for ecosystem services: using willingness to pay and accept, for nature provision and addressing public management in cultural landscape
【24h】

Integrated modelling of payment for ecosystem services: using willingness to pay and accept, for nature provision and addressing public management in cultural landscape

机译:生态系统服务付款的综合模型:利用付款和接受的意愿,自然提供和解决文化景观中的公共管理问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We model “Payment for Ecosystem Services” as a public management of biodiversity (BD) provision where citizens and land users have only a limited understanding of the ecology. Ecosystem services (ESS) can be nutrient recycling, pollination, pest control, etc. and they are linked to BD which is the focus of management. A typical problem in nature valuation is that, although there might exist an eventual vehicle for payment (land use), the underlying ecology might be very complex. To solve this problem we suggest an approach in which ecosystem management is conducted by ecologists who possess the knowledge of pertinent functional relationships between species prevalence and ESS provision. Farmers are compensated based on priority setting and suitability of land as a specific acquisition. Valuation (of species) is presented as a simulation (of a market-like process), i.e. balancing value revelations, based on shadow prices of providers (farmers), users (citizens) and ecologists. We address conflicts with ecologists as managers, farmers as profit maximizers, and citizens as utility retrievers. It is primarily a conflict between managers who argue ecologically for preferred species and land users who have limited knowledge: the conflict is solved by balancing interests. Our approach calibrates interest functions and it allows for quasi-market coordination and public management.
机译:我们将“为生态系统服务付款”建模为对生物多样性(BD)的公共管理,其中公民和土地使用者对生态的了解有限。生态系统服务(ESS)可以是营养物的循环利用,授粉,病虫害防治等,它们与作为管理重点的BD联系在一起。自然价值评估中的一个典型问题是,尽管可能存在最终的支付手段(土地使用),但其潜在的生态可能非常复杂。为了解决这个问题,我们建议由生态学家进行生态系统管理的方法,这些生态学家应该了解物种流行与ESS提供之间的相关功能关系。农民根据优先权的确定和土地的适合性获得补偿。 (物种的)估价是根据(类似于市场的过程)的模拟表示的,即基于提供者(农民),用户(公民)和生态学家的影子价格来平衡价值披露。我们与生态学家(作为管理者),农民(作为利益最大化者)和公民(作为公用事业追索者)解决冲突。这主要是在生态上主张优先物种的管理者与知识有限的土地使用者之间的冲突:冲突是通过平衡利益来解决的。我们的方法可以校准利益函数,并可以进行准市场协调和公共管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号