首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Civil Engineering >Substitution of Kasila Group Basalt with the Archean Man Gneiss in Asphalt and Hydraulic Concrete Mix Design (Sierra Leone)
【24h】

Substitution of Kasila Group Basalt with the Archean Man Gneiss in Asphalt and Hydraulic Concrete Mix Design (Sierra Leone)

机译:Kasila Group玄武岩被Archean Man Gneiss取代为沥青和液压混凝土配合料设计(塞拉利昂)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study of the performances of the Archean of Man gneiss aggregates with the addition of filler to replace the basalt of Kasila group in the asphalt and concrete mix design of southern Sierra Leone is presented in this document. The goal is to compare the results of the asphalt and concrete mix design with gneiss and basalt aggregate. The applied methods and design used are 1) Volumetric design and Marshall method for the asphalt, 2) French Dreux-Gorisse Method for the concrete. We added 2% of gneissic filler and 2% portland cement type 42.5 R to the asphalt hot mix with the gneiss aggregates to follow the criteria variation. The Marshall, the diametric compression and the Duriez tests require us to perform four different types of mix design. The four mix designs meet the requirements but F2 and F4 give the best mechanical properties. F2 (gneiss + 2% filler) and F4 (basalt) have many similarities from which we can conclude their interchangeability. F2 gives 5255 of optimal bitumen content. In regards to hydraulic concrete, the results of the compressive strength test (cement content 350 kg CMI 42.5 R/m3) with the gneiss and basalt aggregates are respectively 40 MPa and 45 MPa at 28 days curing: these values are greater than 35 MPa required by the technical specifications. The use of the Super Fluid® Thermoplast 120 admixture, to increase the concrete compressive strength, is justified by the requirement of a minimum of 80% Rc_(28) at 24 hours. For both types of concrete, we have at 24 hours, 34 and 35 MPa which are higher than the minimum of 32 MPa (in 24 h). These results meet the requirements of the technical specifications.
机译:本文介绍了在塞拉利昂南部的沥青和混凝土混合料设计中,通过添加填料来代替Kasila组的玄武岩,对Man片麻岩骨料的性能进行的研究。目的是将片麻岩和玄武岩骨料的沥青和混凝土混合料设计结果进行比较。使用的方法和设计是:1)沥青的体积设计和马歇尔法,2)混凝土的法国Dreux-Gorisse方法。我们将2%的片麻岩填料和2%的42.5 R波特兰水泥与片麻岩骨料一起加入沥青热拌料中,以遵循标准变化。 Marshall,直径压缩和Duriez测试要求我们执行四种不同类型的混合设计。四种混合设计满足要求,但F2和F4具有最佳的机械性能。 F2(片麻岩+ 2%填料)和F4(玄武岩)有很多相似之处,从中可以得出它们的互换性。 F2给出5255的最佳沥青含量。对于水工混凝土,使用片麻岩和玄武岩骨料在28天养护下的抗压强度测试(水泥含量350 kg CMI 42.5 R / m3)分别为40 MPa和45 MPa:这些值大于要求的35 MPa按技术规格。使用SuperFluid®Thermoplast 120外加剂来提高混凝土的抗压强度,在24小时内要求最低Rc_(28)至少为80%是合理的。对于这两种类型的混凝土,我们在24小时时分别具有34和35 MPa的压力,这比32 MPa的最小值(24小时)要高。这些结果符合技术规范的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号