...
首页> 外文期刊>Open economies review >Deflation, Productivity Shocks and Gold: Evidence from the 1880-1914 Period
【24h】

Deflation, Productivity Shocks and Gold: Evidence from the 1880-1914 Period

机译:通货紧缩,生产率冲击和黄金:1880-1914年时期的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper we examine the sources and impact of deflation on the growth experiences of the four dominant countries on the gold standard in the period 1880-1913: the United States, The United Kingdom, France and Germany. We distinguish between good deflation, (driven by positive aggregate supply shocks) and bad deflation (driven by aggregate demand shocks). We use an empirical Blanchard/Quah model which decomposes the behaviour of prices, output and the money stock into the impact of shocks such as a world price level shock, a domestic supply shock, and domestic demand shocks including a shock to the domestic gold stock. Our key finding is that the European economies were essentially classic in the sense that output was mainly supply driven and that money was neutral even when country specific gold stocks are included. In the United States, however, we observe both good and bad deflation.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了通货紧缩的来源及其对四个主要国家在1880-1913年期间金本位制的增长经验的影响:美国,英国,法国和德国。我们将通货紧缩(由积极的总体供应冲击驱动)与不良通缩(由总需求冲击驱动)进行区分。我们使用布兰查德/夸哈(Blanchard / Quah)经验模型,将价格,产出和货币存量的行为分解为诸如世界价格水平冲击,国内供应冲击和国内需求冲击(包括对国内黄金储备的冲击)之类的冲击的影响。 。我们的主要发现是,欧洲经济从本质上讲是经典的,因为产出主要是由供应驱动的,并且即使包括特定国家的黄金储备,货币也还是中性的。但是,在美国,通缩既有好有坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号