首页> 外文期刊>On-line review >SAVVY SEARCHING Traditional scholarly publishers and Web 2.0: the case of Springer
【24h】

SAVVY SEARCHING Traditional scholarly publishers and Web 2.0: the case of Springer

机译:精明搜索传统学术出版商和Web 2.0:Springer的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Many traditional commercial publishers realise that they need to rejuvenate at least the interface part of their software in order to keep up with the trends in online information retrieval, and information dissemination that cannot be sufficiently limited by the software equivalent of the "No solicitation" and "No trespass" signs. This paper aims to look at the case of Springer and its attempts to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach - The paper focuses on the new version of SpringerLink (launched in August 2010) and other partially free services offered by Springer, the second largest scholarly publisher. The data reported here were collected during the first week of 2011. Findings - The paper finds that many of the Springer services can significantly improve the efficiency of searching the SpringerLink databases. Most can be and should be directly incorporated in an upcoming release of the software. Others need more time for improvement, and to become practical and functional. Originality/value - These recent concentrated in-house efforts by Springer provide a good model for other scholarly publishers and online information services to make their software more state-of-the-art by incorporating useful Web 2.0 features, or simply implementing pre-web functions that have been used only by information professionals because they were user-hostile compared with the gadgets, gizmos, and applets available these days that can do things automatically, smartly and very appealingly, but some of them can also turn out to be a pointless distraction.
机译:目的-许多传统的商业发行商意识到,他们至少需要使软件的界面部分焕发青春,才能跟上在线信息检索和信息发布的趋势,而这种趋势不能被等同于“禁止招标”的软件所充分限制。 ”和“禁止擅自进入”标志。本文旨在研究Springer的情况及其解决此问题的尝试。设计/方法/方法-本文着重于SpringerLink的新版本(于2010年8月推出)以及第二大学术出版商Springer提供的其他部分免费服务。此处报告的数据是在2011年的第一周收集的。结果-本文发现许多Springer服务可以显着提高搜索SpringerLink数据库的效率。大多数都可以并且应该直接纳入即将发布的软件版本中。其他人则需要更多时间进行改进,并变得实用和实用。原创性/价值-Springer最近集中的内部工作为其他学术出版商和在线信息服务提供了一个很好的模型,可以通过合并有用的Web 2.0功能或简单地实现pre-web使他们的软件更先进。信息专业人员仅使用这些功能,因为它们与当今可用的小工具,小控件和小程序相比具有用户敌视性,它们可以自动,智能且非常吸引人地进行操作,但其中某些功能也变得毫无意义分心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号