首页> 外文期刊>Online Information Review >Google Books and WorldCat:a comparison of their content
【24h】

Google Books and WorldCat:a comparison of their content

机译:Google图书和WorldCat:内容比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare Google Books with WorldCat and to assess some other functionalities of Google Books. Design/methodology/approach - Over 500 random samples generated from WorldCat were searched on Google Books. The search results were used to compare the coverage between Google Books and WorldCat, to estimate the successful link rate to a local library catalogue, the percentage available as full view, snippet, and preview on Google Books, and other services of Google Books. Findings - Google Books can retrieve almost all the books catalogued in WorldCat. Its "Find in a library" link to a local library catalogue works 75 percent of the time. Fewer than 10 percent of Google Books items have free full views, and about 15 percent have snippets and previews, respectively. Previews are much more useful than snippets. Google Books probably indexes books that it does not possess in digital form, in addition to indexing all the books that it has acquired in digital form. Originality/value - No previous empirical studies of this kind have been found. This study assesses Google Books' coverage and services with quantitative measures.
机译:目的-本文的目的是将Google图书与WorldCat进行比较,并评估Google图书的其他一些功能。设计/方法/方法-从WorldCat生成的500多个随机样本在Google图书中进行了搜索。搜索结果用于比较Google图书和WorldCat之间的覆盖范围,估算到本地图书馆目录的成功链接率,在Google图书上以全视图,摘要和预览可用的百分比以及Google图书的其他服务。结果-Google图书几乎可以检索WorldCat中分类的所有图书。它的“在图书馆中查找”链接到本地​​图书馆目录的时间占75%。仅有不到10%的Google图书项目具有免费的完整视图,而大约15%的项目具有摘要和预览。预览比摘要有用得多。 Google图书除了索引以数字形式购买的所有书籍外,还可能为它没有数字形式的书籍编制索引。原创性/价值-以前没有找到这种经验研究。这项研究采用定量方法评估了Google图书的覆盖范围和服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号