首页> 外文期刊>Online & CD-Rom Review >A COMPARISON OF THE ACADEMIC INDEX ON CDROM WITH FOUR WILSON INDEXES ON THE OPAC
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF THE ACADEMIC INDEX ON CDROM WITH FOUR WILSON INDEXES ON THE OPAC

机译:CDROM上的学术指标与OPAC上的四个WILSON指标的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While this study was neither large nor rigorous enough to constitute an overall comparison of AI vs. DWIL, it did however provide evidence of the comparability of the two sources so long as NYT is included, as it is now in both. There are many libraries serving either undergraduate communities or the general public and they need general, interdisciplinary database resources for quick searches for preparing speeches, for writing papers in introductory classes and for answering general reference questions. Both AI and the Wilson databases in DWIL meet these needs. If we had been required to make a decision between AI and DWIL on the basis of these search results, I would have cho-sen AI because at that time it provided six months of NYT and DWIL, at that time, did not.
机译:尽管这项研究既不足够大也不严格,无法构成AI与DWIL的整体比较,但是它确实提供了两种来源的可比性的证据,只要包括NYT即可,现在已经包括两者。有许多图书馆为本科生社区或普通大众服务,他们需要通用的跨学科数据库资源来快速搜索准备演讲,撰写入门班论文和回答一般参考问题。 DWIL中的AI和Wilson数据库都可以满足这些需求。如果要求我们根据这些搜索结果在AI和DWIL之间做出决定,那么我会选择AI,因为当时AI提供了六个月的NYT,而DWIL却没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号