首页> 外文期刊>Oceanographic Literature Review >Using molluscs to assess ecological quality status of soft-bottom habitats along the Atlantic coastline of the United States
【24h】

Using molluscs to assess ecological quality status of soft-bottom habitats along the Atlantic coastline of the United States

机译:利用软体动物评估美国大西洋海岸线的软底栖生物质量现状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AMBI and M-AMBI are widely used biotic indices for assessing the ecological quality status of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in estuarine and coastal soft-bottom habitats. Identifying the species needed for estimating these indices, however, is both expensive and time-consuming, and requires a high degree of taxonomic expertise. The use of proxy taxa as a means of subsampling the target community may save time, resources, and the breadth of taxonomic expertise needed. Our study used macroinvertebrate benthic survey data from the Atlantic Coast of the United States to test the fidelity of molluscs as proxies of the whole community. We calculated the AMBI and M-AMBI scores for both the molluscan and whole communities and then adjusted the molluscan-only index scores to that of the whole community using the linear relationship between the two communities within a Bayesian framework. We found that the mollusc-only AMBI approach underperformed at classifying the ecological quality of the whole community, particularly regarding sample sites classified as needing remediation. The low performance of the mollusc-only AMBI approach is likely due to the dearth of molluscs with high environmental stress tolerances. In contrast, the mollusc-only M-AMBI outperformed AMBI at classifying ecological quality. The M-AMBI linear model correctly classified nearly all of the adjusted mollusc-only sample sites needing remediation. The increased efficacy of mollusc-only M-AMBI may be due to the incorporation of species richness and diversity into the index, as both metrics were highly correlated between the molluscan and whole communities. Mollusc-only M-AMBI did have some drawbacks, however, with fidelity decreasing as ecological quality decreased. Overall, our study highlights the potential utility of a mollusc-only approach for assessing the ecological quality of estuarine and coastal soft-bottom habitats.
机译:AMBI和M-AMBI广泛使用生物指数,用于评估Benthic Macroinvertebrate社区在河口和沿海软底栖栖息地的生态质量状况。然而,识别估计这些指标所需的物种既昂贵又耗时,需要高度的分类专业知识。使用代理分类群作为对目标社区的推移手段可以节省时间,资源和宽度所需的分类专业知识。我们的研究使用了来自美国大西洋海岸的Morroinvertebrets Benthic测量数据来测试软体动物的保真度作为整个社区的代理。我们计算了软体动物和整个社区的AMBI和M-AMBI分数,然后使用贝叶斯框架内的两个社区之间的线性关系调整了仅限于整个社区的软体动物索引分数。我们发现,仅在分类整个社区的生态质量方面表现不佳的MOLLUSC-obsbi方法,特别是关于归类的样本网站,所以归类为需要修复。只有Mollusc的AMBI方法的低性能可能是由于具有高环境压力耐受性的软体动物的缺乏。相比之下,MOLLUSC-仅M-AMBI在分类生态质量时表现优于AMBI。 M-AMBI线性模型立即正确分类,只需进行修复的所有调整的软体动物样本位点。只有MOLLUSC的M-AMBI的效果增加可能是由于将物种丰富性和多样性掺入指数中,因为软体动物和整个社区之间的度量高度相关。 MOLLUSC-ock M-AMBI确实具有一些缺点,然而,由于生态质量下降,保真度降低。总体而言,我们的研究突出了唯一的途径途径的潜在效用,用于评估河口和沿海软底栖生态养老物的生态素质。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oceanographic Literature Review》 |2021年第9期|1988-1989|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 United States;

    Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 United States;

    Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 United States;

    Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号