首页> 外文期刊>Oceanographic Literature Review >Comparative wave measurements at a wave energy site with a recently developed low-cost wave buoy (Spotter), adcp, and pressure loggers
【24h】

Comparative wave measurements at a wave energy site with a recently developed low-cost wave buoy (Spotter), adcp, and pressure loggers

机译:波动能量位点的比较波测量,具有最近开发的低成本波浮标(Spotter),ADCP和压力记录器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Wave measurements from a new, low-cost, real-time wave buoy (Spotter) are investigated in a comparative study as part of a site characterization study at a wave energy candidate site at King Island, Tasmania, Australia. Measurements from the Sofar Ocean Spotter buoy are compared with concurrent measurements from a Teledyne RD Instrument (RDI) 1200 kHz Work Horse ADCP and two RBRsolo~3 D wave 16 pressure loggers. The comparison period between 8 August and 12 October 2019 provides both the shallowest and longest continuous published comparison undertaken with the Spotter buoy. Strong agreement was evident between the Spotter buoy and RDI ADCP of key wave parameters including the significant wave height, peak wave period, and mean wave direction, with the mean values of those parameters across the full deployment period agreeing within 3%. Surface wave spectra and directional spectra are also analyzed with good agreement observed over the majority of the frequency domain, although the Spotter buoy records approxi mately 17% less energy within a narrow frequency band near the peak frequency when compared to the RDI ADCP. Measurements derived from the pressure loggers routinely underestimated the significant wave height and over-estimated the mean wave period over the deployment period. The comparison highlights the suitability of the Spotter buoy for low-cost wave resource studies, with accurate measurements of key parameters and spectra observed.
机译:从新的低成本实时波浮标(Spotter)的波测量在比较研究中被研究,作为澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州塔斯马尼亚州王岛的波能量候选地点的场地表征研究的一部分。将来自SOFAR海洋PIPTER浮标的测量与来自Teledyne RD仪器(RDI)1200 kHz工作马ADCP和两个RBRSOLO〜3 D波16压力记录器的同时测量。 2019年8月8日至10月12日至12日之间的比较期提供了与观察员浮标进行的最浅和最长的发布比较。在包括显着波浪高度,峰值波浪周期和均值波方向的钥匙波参数的Spotter Buoy和RDI ADCP之间是明显的,这些参数的平均值在整个部署期内的平均值达到3%。表面波谱和方向谱还通过在大多数频域观察到的良好一致性,尽管与RDI ADCP相比,聚光灯浮标在峰值频率附近的窄频带附近的窄频带内的能量较近,但是在峰值频率附近的能量较小。从压力记录器衍生的测量通常低估了显着波高,并在部署周期上过度估计了平均波段。比较突出了光谱浮标对低成本波浪资源研究的适用性,准确测量关键参数和光谱。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oceanographic Literature Review》 |2021年第9期|2088-2088|共1页
  • 作者单位

    School of Civil Engineering University of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia;

    School of Civil Engineering University of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia;

    School of Civil Engineering University of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号