...
首页> 外文期刊>Oceanographic Literature Review >Fishing or fish farming: The conflict between a crown grant of salmon fishings in the sea and other crown rights in the sea in Scotland
【24h】

Fishing or fish farming: The conflict between a crown grant of salmon fishings in the sea and other crown rights in the sea in Scotland

机译:钓鱼或养鱼:苏格兰海洋中鲑鱼捕捞的皇冠赠送的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Having regard to the foregoing cases, it is contended that where Crown Estate Scotland grant a fish farming lease to a developer in an area where the Crown has already granted the salmon fishing rights to a proprietor, that the salmon fishing proprietor may be able to challenge that grant on the following grounds: As a breach of warrandice, being the grant of a right in breach of the grant of the salmon fishing rights. That the grant of a fish farm lease would amount to a breach of the obligation not to derogate from the grant. That the grant by the Crown Estate Scotland, as a public authority, is contrary to the salmon fishings proprietor's rights under Article Ⅰ of the I st Protocol and so a breach of the Crown Estate Scotland's obligations under section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act. That the developer could be prevented from erecting structures on the sea bed in the area of the salmon fishing rights and could be prevented from polluting the sea in that area if there are reasonable grounds for apprehending injury. The Crown Estate Scotland, as landlord, may be held liable for the actions of their tenant, as the terms of the lease would inevitably lead to the wrongs against the salmon fishing right. The problem for the owner of the salmon fishing rights in the sea is that they have been emasculated by the 2016 Regulations which prevent the keeping of any salmon caught in the sea. However, it is submitted that the existence of the 2016 Regulations should not prevent the proprietor from challenging Crown grants, since at some point in the future stocks may recover, at which point the purpose of the 2016 Regulations (being to restore stocks) would be fulfilled and as such the 2016 Regulations should be lifted. Indeed, the continued development of salmon farms makes such restoration of wild salmon stocks significantly more difficult and so it is arguable that now is the time to make the challenges set out above, before the negative impacts of fish farming on wild salmonids and the wider marine environment grow yet further.
机译:考虑到上述情况,争议皇家庄园苏格兰将鱼类农业租赁给皇冠已经向所有者授予的鲑鱼捕捞权给予专主的领域,鲑鱼类渔版者可能能够挑战对以下理由的授予:作为违法行为,作为违反鲑鱼捕捞权的批准。养鱼农场租赁的批准将违反义务不归于授予的义务。作为一个公共权力的皇家遗产苏格兰的授予与我在I ST协议第Ⅰ条“下的鲑鱼渔业所有权违反了”人权“第6(1)条根据”人权“第6(1)条的义务违反了Crown Estate苏格兰的权利行为。可以防止开发人员在鲑鱼捕捞权地区的海上铺设的结构上,如果有合理的理由造成伤害的理由,可以防止在该地区污染大海。作为房东的皇冠遗产苏格兰对其租户的行为负责,因为租约的条款不可避免地导致对鲑鱼捕捞的错误。海洋中鲑鱼捕捞权的所有者的问题是,他们已经被2016年的法规阉割,这阻止了在海中捕获的任何鲑鱼。然而,据称,2016条规定的存在不应阻止所有者挑战冠冕奖金,因为在未来股票的某些时候可能会恢复,目的是2016年法规(恢复股票)的目的履行,并因此应提升2016年的法规。事实上,鲑鱼农场的持续发展使得野生鲑鱼股的恢复更加困难,因此可以说是在野生鲑鱼养殖和更广泛的海军陆地上的渔业负面影响之前提出上述挑战的时间。环境进一步增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号