Seasonal evolution of L-band SAR backscatter over landfast Arctic sea ice

摘要

We construct and present the first baseline, time series evolution of L-band SAR microwave backscatter (σ_(HH)~0) for landfast Arctic first-year (FYI) and multi-year (MYI) sea ice from ALOS PAL-SAR. We compare the winter to freeze-up seasonal L-band σ_(HH)~0 signatures with C-band RADARSAT-2 SAR imagery and Ku-band QuikSCAT scatterometer data. We also explored the utility of L-band σ_(HH)~0 to detect FYI and MYI melt onset dates. For both ice types, L-band exhibited a similar σ_(HH)~0 evolution to C- and Ku-bands. A rise in L-band σ_(HH)~0 was observed from winter to melt onset, however, with a lower magnitude attributed to the larger penetration of L-band microwaves through the snow-covered sea ice medium. Over FYI, L-band σ_(HH)~0 exhibited the most robust response and greater diversity in melt onset signature, compared to C- and Ku-bands. Over MYI, L-band σ_(HH)~0 declined during the winter to melt onset transition contrasting the C- and Ku-band evolution of σ_(HH)~0 during melt onset. Although, a distinct L-band σ_(HH)~0 response was not found during pond onset, a very strong σ_(HH)~0 response was found during sea ice break-up, which could operationally be utilized to identify sea ice break-up timing. During freeze-up, L-band σ_(HH)~0 showed greater diversity compared to C-and Ku-bands. Our study also found that, L-band detected melt onset dates were up to 6 days later than C- and Ku-band detected dates, for both ice types. The melt response was the strongest at L-band for FYI, where C-band detected a robust melt onset date for MYI. Therefore, for operational sea ice monitoring, L-band suits better for FYI, whereas C-band is still a better choice for MYI. In the wanning Arctic, where FYI has become the dominant ice type, L-band demonstrates promise to be the optimal choice for sea ice operational monitoring with high spatiotemporal data acquisition from existing, upcoming and proposed L-band SAR missions.