首页> 外文期刊>Ocean Dynamics >Assessing the fidelity of surface currents from a coastal ocean model and HF radar using drifting buoys in the Middle Atlantic Bight
【24h】

Assessing the fidelity of surface currents from a coastal ocean model and HF radar using drifting buoys in the Middle Atlantic Bight

机译:使用中大西洋海岸线上的浮标评估沿海海洋模型和HF雷达的地表电流保真度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rapid expansion of urbanization along the world's coastal areas requires a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the coastal ocean. Over the past several decades, numerical ocean circulation models have tried to provide such insight, based on our developing understanding of physical ocean processes. The systematic establishment of coastal ocean observation systems adopting cutting-edge technology, such as high frequency (HF) radar, satellite sensing, and gliders, has put such ocean model predictions to the test, by providing comprehensive observational datasets for the validation of numerical model forecasts. The New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System (NYHOPS) is a comprehensive system for understanding coastal ocean processes on the continental shelf waters of New York and New Jersey. To increase confidence in the system's ocean circulation predictions in that area, a detailed validation exercise was carried out using HF radar and La-grangian drifter-derived surface currents from three drifters obtained between March and October 2010. During that period, the root mean square (RMS) differences of both the east-west and north-south currents between NYHOPS and HF radar were approximately 15 cm s~(-1). Harmonic analysis of NYHOPS and HF radar surface currents shows similar tidal ellipse parameters for the dominant M_2 tide, with a mean difference of 2.4 cm s~(-1) in the semi-major axis and 1.4 cm s~(-1) in the semi-minor axis and 3° in orientation and 10° in phase. Surface currents derived independently from drifters along their trajectories showed that NYHOPS and HF radar yielded similarly accurate results. RMS errors when compared to currents derived along the trajectory of the three drifters were approximately 10 cm s~(-1). Overall, the analysis suggests that NYHOPS and HF radar had similar skill in estimating the currents over the continental shelf waters of the Middle Atlantic Bight during this time period. An ensemble-based set of particle tracking simulations using one drifter which was tracked for 11 days showed that the ensemble mean separation generally increases with time in a linear fashion. The separation distance is not dominated by high frequency or short spatial scale wavelengths suggesting that both the NYHOPS and HF radar currents are representing tidal and inertial time scales correctly and resolving some of the smaller scale eddies. The growing ensemble mean separation distance is dominated by errors in the mean flow causing the drifters to slowly diverge from their observed positions. The separation distance for both HF radar and NYHOPS stays below 30 km after 5 days, and the two technologies have similar tracking skill at the 95 % level. For comparison, the ensemble mean distance of a drifter from its initial release location (persistence assumption) is estimated tdb"e greater than 70 km in 5 days.
机译:全世界沿海地区城市化的迅速发展要求对沿海海洋有更全面,更准确的了解。在过去的几十年中,基于对海洋物理过程的不断发展的理解,数值海洋环流模型试图提供这种见解。通过提供诸如高频(HF)雷达,卫星感测和滑翔机等尖端技术的沿海海洋观测系统的系统建立,通过提供全面的观测数据集以验证数值模型,将这种海洋模型预测进行了测试预测。纽约港观测和预报系统(NYHOPS)是一个综合系统,用于了解纽约和新泽西州大陆架水域的沿海海洋过程。为了增加对该系统在该地区海洋环流预测的信心,我们使用HF雷达和拉格朗日漂移源于2010年3月至2010年10月间获得的三个漂移源的地表电流进行了详细的验证练习。在此期间,均方根NYHOPS和HF雷达之间东西向和南北向电流(RMS)的差约为15 cm s〜(-1)。 NYHOPS和HF雷达表面电流的谐波分析显示,优势M_2潮汐具有相似的潮汐椭圆参数,半长轴的平均差为2.4 cm s〜(-1),而半长轴的平均差为1.4 cm s〜(-1)。半短轴,方向为3°,相位为10°。从漂移者沿着其轨迹独立获得的表面电流表明,NYHOPS和HF雷达产生了相似的准确结果。与沿三个漂移器的轨迹导出的电流相比,RMS误差约为10 cm s〜(-1)。总体而言,分析表明,在这段时间内,NYHOPS和HF雷达在估算中大西洋沿岸大陆架水流方面具有相似的技能。使用一个跟踪器跟踪了11天的基于集合的粒子跟踪模拟,结果表明,集合平均分离通常以线性方式随时间增加。分离距离不受高频或短空间尺度波长的支配,这表明NYHOPS和HF雷达电流都正确地代表了潮汐和惯性时间尺度,并解决了一些较小尺度的涡流。整体平均分离距离的增加受平均流量误差的影响,导致漂移者逐渐偏离其观测位置。 HF雷达和NYHOPS的分离距离在5天后均保持在30 km以下,并且两种技术在95%的水平上具有相似的跟踪技能。为了进行比较,估计在5天内漂移者从其初始释放位置的总体平均距离(持续性假设)大于70 km。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号