首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Challenges for integration of the Polish fishing sector into marine spatial planning (MSP): do fishers and planners tell the same story?
【24h】

Challenges for integration of the Polish fishing sector into marine spatial planning (MSP): do fishers and planners tell the same story?

机译:将波兰捕捞业纳入海洋空间规划(MSP)的挑战:渔民和规划者是否讲同样的故事?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we explore the Polish fishers' perception of marine spatial planning (MSP) processes off the Polish coast. Our research is guided by the radical approach to MSP which, at its centre, places the interplay between MSP actors and their stakes. Our approach certainly considers the relationship of MSP with politics and power, questioning the rational choice. Hence, we have selected fishers as a group which is often recognised as less privileged, with no or little influence on MSP. Firstly, using semi-structured interviews, we investigated the ways in which fishers identify the challenges inhibiting their meaningful participation in MSP. The fishers pointed out data and knowledge gaps as well as a perceived limited agency in decision-making. However, misconceptions about MSP, i.e., equating MSP to offshore wind farms, appeared to be the most significant short-term challenge. Secondly, through a focus group with MSP planners, we explored what the planners recognised as barriers to the fishers' active participation, and gauged the planners' awareness regarding the problems identified by the fishers. Both groups, fishers and planners, identified similar challenges. The major difference between these two groups was the issue of who should be responsible for addressing the concerns they identified. We conclude that much of the fishers' reluctance towards MSP stemmed from their negative experiences in previous marine management initiatives, leading to a general lack of trust among the members of this group. We speculate that this lack of trust could have been diminished through a properly implemented stakeholder mapping in the pre-planning phase. However, the schedule stipulated by the EU MSP Directive, i.e., to prepare the plans before early 2021, did not allow the necessary time for the accomplishment of this step. We, thus, postulate that the stakeholder consultation process should be decoupled from formal MSP, and it should be most active in the pre-planning phase.
机译:在本文中,我们探索了波兰渔民对波兰沿海海洋空间规划(MSP)过程的看法。我们的研究以对MSP的激进方法为指导,该方法以MSP为中心,将MSP参与者及其利益之间的相互作用放在了一起。我们的方法当然考虑了MSP与政治和权力的关系,并对合理的选择提出了质疑。因此,我们选择了通常被认为特权较低,对MSP几乎没有影响的渔民。首先,我们使用半结构化访谈,调查了渔民发现阻碍其有效参与MSP的挑战的方式。渔民指出了数据和知识方面的差距以及在决策中被认为有限的机构。但是,关于MSP的误解,即将MSP等同于海上风电场,似乎是最重大的短期挑战。其次,通过与MSP计划者组成的焦点小组,我们探索了计划者认为是渔民积极参与的障碍,并评估了计划者对渔民发现的问题的意识。渔民和计划者这两个团体也发现了类似的挑战。这两组之间的主要区别在于谁应负责解决他们所确定的问题。我们得出的结论是,许多渔民不愿接受MSP的原因是他们在以前的海洋管理计划中的负面经验,导致该组成员之间普遍缺乏信任。我们推测,通过在预先计划阶段正确实施利益相关者映射,可以减少这种信任的缺乏。但是,欧盟MSP指令规定的时间表(即在2021年初之前准备计划)并没有必要的时间来完成此步骤。因此,我们假定利益相关者的协商过程应与正式的MSP脱钩,并且在计划前阶段应最为活跃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号