首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Negotiating uncertainty: Framing attitudes, prioritizing issues, and finding consensus in the coral reef environment management 'crisis'
【24h】

Negotiating uncertainty: Framing attitudes, prioritizing issues, and finding consensus in the coral reef environment management 'crisis'

机译:谈判不确定性:在珊瑚礁环境管理“危机”中构筑态度,优先考虑问题并达成共识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Environmental problems are becoming increasingly unwieldy, particularly those which are highly debated because of their political and financial consequences and have been termed as in "crisis". In coral reef environments, these considerations spill into decisions on mitigation of reef decline and attendant questions of territorial and resource-access rights. Historical foundations of reef science show that early applications of reef inquiries centered on environmental connection and inevitably led to establishing not only the baseline of reef ecosystems, but also contributed to the evolution of conservation crisis in this environment. This work applies Q-methodology towards determining attitudes, prioritizing state ments and finding consensus regarding management issues that are tied to the science of coral reef environments and their conservation "crisis". This work delineates the social construction of attitudes, perceptions, and foundations of coral conservation science by examining the scientifically-grounded statements that constitute conservation debates. Study participants were comprised of the coral reef science and conservation professional network. The Q-sample (n = 43) was structured around some central debates over the dilemmas and strategies of reef management and decline-mitigation, both recent and long-running. Four attitudes or viewpoints were isolated in terms of their preferred management models, geographic perspectives and the role scientific findings play within these core beliefs. These can be generally described as Community and Locally-centered Humanists, Scientific Idealists, Skeptical and Utilitarian Pragmatists, and Politically-oriented Positivists. Evaluating agreement about central issues showed a high degree of consensus regarding the relative importance of community input in the role of successful reef management while the highest degree of contention was seen in scalar issues such as human-environment feedback systems that are inherent in solving environmental crises.
机译:环境问题变得越来越难以处理,特别是那些因其政治和财务后果而引起广泛争议的环境问题,被称为“危机”。在珊瑚礁环境中,这些考虑因素会影响到有关减少珊瑚礁衰退的决定以及随之而来的领土和资源获取权问题。珊瑚礁科学的历史基础表明,珊瑚礁查询的早期应用以环境联系为中心,不可避免地导致不仅建立了珊瑚礁生态系统的基准,而且还促进了这种环境下保护危机的演变。这项工作将Q方法应用于确定态度,优先陈述并在与珊瑚礁环境及其保护“危机”的科学相关的管理问题上达成共识。这项工作通过研究构成保护辩论​​的科学依据的陈述,描绘出了珊瑚保护科学的态度,观念和基础的社会建构。研究参与者包括珊瑚礁科学和保护专业网络。 Q样本(n = 43)围绕近期和长期运行的关于珊瑚礁管理和减缓珊瑚礁的困境和策略的一些中心辩论而构建。根据首选的管理模式,地理观点和科学发现在这些核心信念中的作用,将四种态度或观点隔离开来。这些可以概括地描述为以社区和本地为中心的人本主义者,科学理想主义者,怀疑主义和功利主义实用主义者以及政治取向的实证主义者。关于中心问题的评估共识表明,在社区意见对成功进行珊瑚礁管理的作用中的相对重要性方面达成了高度共识,而在解决环境危机固有的标量问题(例如人类环境反馈系统)中,争议程度最高。 。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2010年第10期|p.597-614|共18页
  • 作者

    Baerbel G. Bischof;

  • 作者单位

    Florida State University, Department of Geography, 323 Bellamy Building, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号