...
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >One party does not tango! Fishers' non-participation as a barrier to co-management in Paraty, Brazil
【24h】

One party does not tango! Fishers' non-participation as a barrier to co-management in Paraty, Brazil

机译:一党不探戈!渔民的不参与成为巴西帕拉蒂共同管理的障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Paraty (Brazil), where small-scale fisheries and protected areas management are intertwined, government agencies have shown an intention to transition towards participatory management schemes. Regardless of fishers' great interest in participation, the low number of fishers attending meetings is a recurrent theme. The objective of this paper is to contribute to understanding why small-scale fishers do not participate in meetings with the government (or rarely do). The research was based on a case study in two adjacent communities in Paraty: Praia Grande and Una do Araujo. Data came from three main sources: interviews with fishers; participant observation during a Consultative Council meeting of the Tamoios Ecological Station (a no-take protected area) in which a participatory process was initiated; and interviews with officers of the protected area. Fishers' reasons for why they do not participate in meetings with the government, or why there is low fisher participation in such meetings, were numerous and divide into three themes: (1) hierarchical governance (legislation and fishers-government relationship); (2) fisher-related barriers (fishers' feelings/emotions or perceptions towards meetings, incompatibility between fishers' way of life and meetings, and representativeness); and (3) process deficiency (previous to the meeting, during the meeting, and meetings' outcomes). Our research sheds light on the non-participants' viewpoints about government meetings, contributing to filling a research gap in the participation literature, while also contributing to knowledge about barriers to the emergence of co-management (e.g. conflictual relationships between the two parties, and the nature of the meetings). Based on fishers' opinions about meetings they would definitely participate in, the analysis of fishers' reasons for not participating as well as the managers' perspectives, and the evaluation of the meeting (using Rowe and Frewer's framework), we propose guidelines for developing participatory processes in fisheries management: (i) the convening of the meetings should be appropriate; (ii) the facilitation of the whole participatory process must be unbiased; (iii) the transparency of the process should be ensured both internally and externally; and (iv) the objectives, procedures and intended outcomes must be clearly defined. Recommendations for future actions in the transition towards co-management are also made, such as capacity building initiatives involving fishers and managers.
机译:在帕拉蒂(巴西),小规模渔业与保护区管理交织在一起,政府机构已表明有意向参与性管理计划过渡。无论渔民对参与的兴趣如何,参加会议的渔民人数很少都是一个经常性的主题。本文的目的是有助于理解为什么小型渔民不参加(或很少参加)与政府的会议。这项研究是基于在Paraty的两个相邻社区进行的案例研究:Praia Grande和Una do Araujo。数据来自三个主要来源:与渔民的访谈;在Tamoios生态站(禁区)的协商理事会会议上进行参与者观察,并在此会议上启动了参与过程;并对保护区的官员进行采访。渔民为什么不参加与政府的会议或渔民参加这种会议的比例低的原因很多,并分为三个主题:(1)分级治理(立法和渔民与政府之间的关系); (2)与渔民有关的障碍(渔民对会议的感受/情感,渔民的生活方式和会议之间的不兼容性以及代表性); (3)流程不足(在会议之前,会议期间以及会议结果中)。我们的研究揭示了非参与者对政府会议的观点,有助于填补参与文献中的研究空白,同时也有助于了解共同管理出现的障碍(例如,两党之间的冲突关系,以及会议的性质)。基于渔民对他们肯定会参加的会议的观点,对渔民不参加的原因的分析以及管理人员的观点以及对会议的评估(使用Rowe和Frewer的框架),我们提出了发展参与性的指南渔业管理过程:(i)召开会议应适当; (ii)促进整个参与过程必须是公正的; (iii)应当在内部和外部确保过程的透明度; (iv)必须明确定义目标,程序和预期结果。还提出了向共同管理过渡的未来行动的建议,例如涉及渔民和管理人员的能力建设举措。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2014年第5期|9-18|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Natural Resources Institute, 303-70 Dysart Road, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2 Manitoba, Canada;

    Environmental Studies and Research Centre (NEPAM), Rua dos Flamboyants, 155, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-867, Brazil;

    Environmental Studies and Research Centre (NEPAM), Rua dos Flamboyants, 155, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-867, Brazil;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号