首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Marshes with and without sills protect estuarine shorelines from erosion better than bulkheads during a Category 1 hurricane
【24h】

Marshes with and without sills protect estuarine shorelines from erosion better than bulkheads during a Category 1 hurricane

机译:在发生1类飓风时,有无窗槛的沼泽比河壁更能保护河口海岸线免受侵蚀

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Acting on the perception that they perform better for longer, most property owners in the United States choose hard engineered structures, such as bulkheads or riprap revetments, to protect estuarine shorelines from erosion. Less intrusive alternatives, specifically marsh plantings with and without sills, have the potential to better sustain marsh habitat and support its ecosystem services, yet their shoreline protection capabilities during storms have not been evaluated. In this study, the performances of alternative shoreline protection approaches during Hurricane Irene (Category 1 storm) were compared by 1) classifying resultant damage to shorelines with different types of shoreline protection in three NC coastal regions after Irene; and 2) quantifying shoreline erosion at marshes with and without sills in one NC region by using repeated measurements of marsh surface elevation and marsh vegetation stem density before and after Irene. In the central Outer Banks, NC, where the strongest sustained winds blew across the longest fetch; Irene damaged 76% of bulkheads surveyed, while no damage to other shoreline protection options was detected. Across marsh sites within 25 km of its landfall, Hurricane Irene had no effect on marsh surface elevations behind sills or along marsh shorelines without sills. Although Irene temporarily reduced marsh vegetation density at sites with and without sills, vegetation recovered to pre-hurricane levels within a year. Storm responses suggest that marshes with and without sills are more durable and may protect shorelines from erosion better than the bulkheads in a Category 1 storm. This study is the first to provide data on the shoreline protection capabilities of marshes with and without sills relative to bulkheads during a substantial storm event, and to articulate a research framework to assist in the development of comprehensive policies for climate change adaptation and sustainable management of estuarine shorelines and resources in U.S. and globally.
机译:基于人们认为它们的使用寿命更长的观点,美国大多数财产所有者选择了坚固的结构,例如舱壁或护堤护岸,以保护河口海岸线免受侵蚀。侵入性较小的替代物,特别是有和没有窗台的沼泽植物,都有可能更好地维持沼泽生境并支持其生态系统服务,但尚未评估其在风暴中的海岸线保护能力。在这项研究中,通过以下方法比较了飓风“艾琳”(类别1风暴)期间替代性海岸线保护方法的性能:1)对艾琳之后三个北卡罗莱纳州沿海地区因不同类型的海岸线保护对海岸线造成的破坏进行分类; 2)通过重复测量艾琳前后的沼泽地表高程和沼泽植被茎密度来量化一个NC区域中有无窗台的沼泽的海岸线侵蚀。在北卡罗来纳州中部的外岸地区,持续时间最长的风吹过最强的持续风;艾琳(Irene)损坏了所调查的76%的舱壁,而未发现其他海岸线保护选项受到损坏。在距其陆地25公里以内的沼泽地带,艾琳飓风对窗台后面或没有窗台的沼泽海岸线上的沼泽地表海拔没有影响。尽管艾琳(Irene)暂时降低了有无窗台的沼泽地植被密度,但植被在一年内恢复到飓风前的水平。暴风雨的响应表明,带和不带窗台的沼泽地比第1类暴风雨中的舱壁更耐久,并且可以更好地保护海岸线免受侵蚀。这项研究是第一个提供关于在重大风暴事件期间有或没有门槛的沼泽地的海岸线保护能力的数据,并且阐明了一个研究框架,以协助制定有关气候变化适应和可持续管理的综合政策。美国乃至全球的河口海岸线和资源。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2014年第12期|94-102|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA;

    Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA;

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;

    Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA,Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coastal management; Marsh; Erosion; Estuarine shoreline protection; Storm;

    机译:沿海管理;沼泽;侵蚀;河口海岸线保护;风暴;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:40:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号