【24h】

RFSFARCH PLUS

机译:RFSFARCH PLUS

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Physical hygiene measures are highly effective in preventing the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), according to a meta-analysis of six case-control studies. However, an updated systematic review/judged most of the randomised and cluster-randomised controlled trials to be of poor quality. The following physical methods are effective: handwashing more than 10 times a day; wearing masks, gloves and gowns; and isolation of potentially infected patients. There is only limited evidence that expensive [US/NIOSH standard] N95 masks are more effective than simple surgical masks - though they may be useful in high-risk situations. There is inconclusive evidence on the benefit of adding virucidals/antiseptics to normal handwashing. The greatest benefit is achieved through hygiene measures aimed at young children and household members of index cases.
机译:根据六项病例对照研究的荟萃分析,身体卫生措施对预防严重急性呼吸道综合症(SARS)的传播非常有效。但是,最新的系统评价/判断大多数随机和聚类随机对照试验的质量均较差。以下物理方法有效:每天洗手10次以上;戴口罩,手套和礼服;和隔离潜在感染的患者。仅有有限的证据表明,昂贵的[US / NIOSH标准] N95口罩比简单的外科口罩更有效-尽管它们在高风险情况下可能有用。没有结论性证据表明在常规洗手过程中添加杀病毒剂/防腐剂是有好处的。通过针对幼儿和索引病例的家庭成员的卫生措施,可以获得最大的收益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Occupational Health [at Work]》 |2009年第3期|39-40|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号