首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >SUMMARY FOR THREE DIFFERENT VALIDATION CASES OF COOLANT FLOW IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER TEST SECTIONS WITH THE CFD CODE ANSYSCFX 11.0
【24h】

SUMMARY FOR THREE DIFFERENT VALIDATION CASES OF COOLANT FLOW IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER TEST SECTIONS WITH THE CFD CODE ANSYSCFX 11.0

机译:使用CFD代码ANSYSCFX 11.0对超临界水测试部分中的冷却剂流动的三种不同验证案例的摘要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes have become promising tools for the investigation of thermal hydraulics in revolutionary reactor concepts in the last decade. In Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes calculations, the CFD codes (for example, the ANSYS CFX code used here) use turbulence modeling, wall functions, and other approaches. Therefore, the accuracy of CFD codes for water flow under supercritical conditions has to be examined. The first aim of this work is to investigate the effects of different material property definition methods on the numerical results obtained with CFX code. The second aim is to assess the accuracy of the conventional turbulence models (such as k-ε, k-ω), and SST) under supercritical water conditions. The results and comparison of three independent validations for supercritical water flow in vertical smooth-bore tubes with upward flow direction are presented in this paper. It is well known that the material properties strongly depend on the temperature and the pressure near and above the thermo-rndynamic critical point, ft is demonstrated that rather than analytical or discrete point methods, the IAPWS-IF97 material table best represents the strongly changing material properties. A nonaxialsymmetric effect on result fields was not found based on the three validations; therefore, a rotational periodic or two-dimensional grid approach is recommended for further validations of homogenously heated, vertically installed, smooth-bore straight tubes cooled by supercritical water. The calculation results have been compared with measurements, and the computational errors for the three validations were found to be in the ranges of 0 to 25%, 0 to 18%, and 2 to 40% for the Swenson, Yamagata, and Herkenrath experiments, respectively. The results of the three validations indicate the need to improve a turbulence model to take into account the buoyancy effect on the turbulence for thermal-hydraulic calculations of the supercritical water.
机译:在过去的十年中,计算流体力学(CFD)代码已成为研究革命性反应堆概念中的热力学的有前途的工具。在雷诺平均Navier-Stokes计算中,CFD代码(例如,此处使用的ANSYS CFX代码)使用湍流建模,墙函数和其他方法。因此,必须检查超临界条件下水流的CFD代码的准确性。这项工作的首要目的是研究不同材料属性定义方法对使用CFX代码获得的数值结果的影响。第二个目的是评估超临界水条件下常规湍流模型(例如k-ε,k-ω和SST)的准确性。本文提出了三个独立验证的超临界水向上流动方向在垂直光滑孔管中的比较结果。众所周知,材料特性很大程度上取决于温度和热力学动态临界点附近和上方的压力,ft表明,IAPWS-IF97材料表最能代表变化剧烈的材料,而不是分析或离散点方法属性。基于这三个验证,未发现对结果字段有非轴对称的影响。因此,建议使用旋转周期性或二维网格方法来进一步验证由超临界水冷却的均匀加热,垂直安装的平孔直管。将计算结果与测量结果进行了比较,对于Swenson,Yamagata和Herkenrath实验,这三个验证的计算误差在0至25%,0至18%和2至40%的范围内,分别。这三个验证的结果表明,需要改进湍流模型,以考虑对超临界水进行热工水力计算时,湍流的浮力效应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Technology》 |2010年第1期|40-53|共14页
  • 作者

    ATTILA KISS; ATTILA ASZODI;

  • 作者单位

    Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Nuclear Techniques 1111, Budapest, Muegyetem rkp. 9, Hungary;

    Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Nuclear Techniques 1111, Budapest, Muegyetem rkp. 9, Hungary;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    thermal hydraulics of supercritical water; computational fluid dynamics; validation;

    机译:超临界水的热力学;计算流体动力学;验证;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:43:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号