首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >COUPLING THE BACK END OF FUEL CYCLES WITH REPOSITORIES
【24h】

COUPLING THE BACK END OF FUEL CYCLES WITH REPOSITORIES

机译:燃料循环后端与储存库的耦合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fuel cycles have not historically been integrated with repository design. Four alternative combinations of fuel cycles and repository systems are assessed in the present work: (a) traditional repositories, (b) repositories with spent nuclear fuel retrievability for recycle or as insurance against unforeseen repository failure, (c) coloca-tion and integration of reprocessing and repositories, and (d) colocated specialized disposal facilities such as boreholes for different wastes. System design choices have major impacts on fuel cycle economics, accident risk, repository performance, nonproliferation, and repository siting. Consequently, there are large incentives to understand the different ways to couple fuel cycles and repositories. The evidence suggests that a repository as only a disposal site (the current system) is the least desirable option given current requirements for the United States. There are large incentives to develop repository sites that colocate and integrate all back-end fuel cycle facilities with the repository-independent of the fuel cycles that are ultimately chosen or how these fuel cycles evolve over time. Colocation and integration change the interface requirements between facilities by eliminating many storage and transport requirements such as the need for waste forms with high waste loadings. That, in turn, can result in reductions in cost, reductions in risk, and improved repository performance. For closed fuel cycles, colocation and integration may eliminate repository safeguards. This also suggests a repository business model similar to that of many airport authorities. Airport authorities manage the runways with colocated public and private airline terminals, aircraft maintenance bases, and related operations-all enabled and benefiting from the high-value runway asset. The common high-value back-end fuel cycle asset is the repository. For the local community and state government, such a strategy couples back-end fuel cycle benefits (high-technology jobs, tax revenue, etc.) with the repository site.
机译:燃料循环历来没有与储存库设计集成在一起。在当前工作中,评估了燃料循环和储存库系统的四种替代组合:(a)传统储存库,(b)具有乏核燃料可回收性的储存库,以进行循环利用或作为防止不可预见的储存库故障的保证,(c)储存和整合后处理和处置库,以及(d)将专用处置设施(例如用于不同废物的钻孔)设置在同一地点。系统设计选择对燃油循环经济性,事故风险,储存库性能,防扩散和储存库选址有重大影响。因此,有很大的动机去了解耦合燃料循环和储存库的不同方式。有证据表明,鉴于美国当前的需求,仅作为处置场所(当前系统)的处置库是最不理想的选择。有很大的动机来开发储存库站点,该库站点将所有后端燃料循环设施与储存库并置并整合在一起,而与最终选择的燃料循环或这些燃料循环如何随时间演变无关。主机代管和集成通过消除许多存储和运输要求(例如对具有高废物负载的废物形式的需求)来更改设施之间的接口要求。反过来,这可以导致成本降低,风险降低以及存储库性能提高。对于封闭的燃料循环,主机代管和集成可以消除存储库的保护措施。这也暗示了与许多机场当局相似的仓库业务模型。机场当局通过位于同一地点的公共和私人航空公司航站楼,飞机维修基地以及相关运营来管理跑道,所有这些都可以启用并从高价值的跑道资产中受益。常见的高价值后端燃料循环资产是存储库。对于当地社区和州政府而言,这种策略将后端燃料循环收益(高科技工作,税收等)与存储库地点结合在一起。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Technology》 |2012年第2期|p.191-204|共14页
  • 作者

    CHARLES FORSBERG;

  • 作者单位

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    fuel cycle; reposi-tory; spent nuclear fuel;

    机译:燃油循环;仓库乏核燃料;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:43:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号