首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF TURBULENT FLOW WITH HEAT TRANSFER IN A ROD BUNDLE
【24h】

LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF TURBULENT FLOW WITH HEAT TRANSFER IN A ROD BUNDLE

机译:棒束内带换热的湍流大涡模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To assess the accuracy of large-eddy simulation (LES) predictions for flow without and with heat transfer in a rod bundle, analyses were performed with a constant-coefficient Smagorinsky LES model, and numerical predictions were compared with experimental measurements in a heated triangular rod array. First, flow simulations without heat transfer were performed with one and two channels at the central region of the bundle, and simulation predictions were compared with the experimental data. For the normalized mean axial velocity and the axial component of the turbulent intensity, the predictions of the one-channel model are nearly identical with those of the two-channel model. For the other turbulence parameters, the predictions of the one-channel model are either identical or are mostly in good agreement with those of the two-channel model. LES predictions for the mean axial velocity agree well with experimental measurements. Predictions of the axial component of the turbulent intensity agree well with experimental measurements for most of the points of measurement. Predictions of the other parameters of turbulence agree well to reasonably well with measurements. Because LES simulations are computationally very demanding, the LES simulation of heat transfer was performed only with the one-channel model. LES predicts the temperature of the rod surface within the range of the experimental error. The profile (log law) of the dimensionless fluid temperature T~+ predicted by LES has the same slope as that derived from the measurements, but it has a significantly higher constant. The turbulent intensity of temperature is predicted well to reasonably well. The turbulent heat flux in the axial direction and the radial direction is predicted well at points away from the wall, but there is significant discrepancy between predictions and measurements close to the wall. The predicted turbulent heat flux in the azimuthal direction agrees very well to quite well with measurements.
机译:为了评估棒束中不带传热和带传热的大涡模拟(LES)预测的准确性,使用恒定系数Smagorinsky LES模型进行了分析,并将数值预测与加热三角棒中的实验测量值进行了比较数组。首先,在束的中心区域使用一个和两个通道进行了无传热的流动模拟,并将模拟预测与实验数据进行了比较。对于归一化的平均轴向速度和湍流强度的轴向分量,单通道模型的预测与双通道模型的预测几乎相同。对于其他湍流参数,单通道模型的预测与双通道模型的预测相同或基本一致。 LES对平均轴向速度的预测与实验测量结果非常吻合。对于大多数测量点,湍流强度轴向分量的预测与实验测量非常吻合。湍流其他参数的预测与测量结果相当吻合。由于LES模拟对计算的要求很高,因此仅使用单通道模型执行LES传热模拟。 LES在实验误差范围内预测杆表面的温度。 LES预测的无量纲流体温度T〜+的分布图(对数定律)与从测量得出的斜率具有相同的斜率,但是其常数明显更高。可以很好地预测温度的湍流强度。沿轴向和径向的湍流热通量在远离墙的点处得到了很好的预测,但是在靠近墙的位置进行的预测和测量之间存在显着差异。沿方位角方向的预测湍流通量与测量非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号