首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Technology >UPDATE OF THE FIRST TEPCO MAAP ACCIDENT ANALYSIS OF UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION
【24h】

UPDATE OF THE FIRST TEPCO MAAP ACCIDENT ANALYSIS OF UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION

机译:FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI核电站1号,2号和3号机组第一次TEPCO MAAP事故分析的更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Because of the Great East Japan Earthquake, and the resulting tsunami, which occurred on March 11, 2011, a serious accident occurred in Units 1, 2, and 3 of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. Since the accidents, data from interviews with operators and on-site surveys have been continuously compiled. Based on the data, a plant-state analysis has been conducted using the severe accident analysis code MAAP (Modular Accident Analysis Program). Parallel to the MAAP analysis, the responses of the plant to site operations, such as water injection, are analyzed, and core conditions are comprehensively evaluated. According to the evaluation, in Unit 1, it is presumed that almost no fuel was left at the original position; it was molten and moved downward. The fuel likely damaged the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), and it is assumed that most of it had dropped to the primary containment vessel (PCV) pedestal. In Units 2 and 3, it is presumed that some of the fuel was left at the original position and the rest dropped to the bottom of the RPV or to the PCV pedestal. In the MAAP analysis, the behavior of the plants before core melt is reproduced. However, RPV damage of Units 2 and 3 does not occur in the MAAP analysis, which is contrary to the observed facts. This shows that the analysis capability of the current MAAP code is limited. Therefore, by developing severe accident analysis codes to achieve higher levels of accuracy and by evaluating the plant responses to site operation, we will continue to obtain a clear picture of the states inside the reactor so that fuel debris can be removed.
机译:由于2011年3月11日发生的东日本大地震和随之而来的海啸,福岛第一核电站的1号,2号和3号机组发生了严重事故。自事故发生以来,来自运营商访谈和现场调查的数据一直在不断收集中。基于这些数据,已经使用严重事故分析代码MAAP(模块化事故分析程序)进行了工厂状态分析。与MAAP分析并行,分析了工厂对现场操作(例如注水)的响应,并对核心条件进行了综合评估。根据评估,在第1单元中,假定几乎没有燃料留在原始位置。它融化并向下移动。燃料可能损坏了反应堆压力容器(RPV),并且假定大部分燃料已经掉落到主安全壳(PCV)基座上。在单元2和3中,假定部分燃料保留在原始位置,其余部分则落在RPV的底部或PCV基座上。在MAAP分析中,再现了核心融化之前植物的行为。但是,在MAAP分析中不会发生2号和3号机组RPV损坏,这与观察到的事实相反。这表明当前MAAP代码的分析能力是有限的。因此,通过制定严格的事故分析代码以实现更高的准确性,并通过评估工厂对现场运行的响应,我们将继续获得反应堆内部状态的清晰图片,从而可以清除燃料碎片。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Technology》 |2014年第2期|263-279|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc., 1-1-3, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-8560, Japan;

    Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc., 1-1-3, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-8560, Japan;

    Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc., 1-1-3, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-8560, Japan;

    Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc., 1-1-3, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-8560, Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    severe accident; Fukushima Daiichi accident progression; MAAP;

    机译:严重事故福岛第一核电站事故进展;行动计划;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:43:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号