...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear news >Costs, value, and diversity of generating sources
【24h】

Costs, value, and diversity of generating sources

机译:发电来源的成本,价值和多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The ongoing debate about the "best" source of electricity generation in the United States ostensibly deals with economics, but it is clear that reduced carbon production is the goal of U.S. energy policy. Traditional carbon-producing fuels are the lowest-cost source of electricity generation. The question now is, which source of generation produces electricity with low carbon output at the lowest cost? Overall, the dis- cussion about the economics of electricity generation is really about self-interest. One group places a high value on clean energy, while another values job creation. Producers seek to make a profit, while social activists value low pricing for the economically disadvantaged. It is obvious that no single source of generation can "win" the debate. Will nuclear power be part of the carbon-free generating industry? More important, are customers willing to pay for carbon-free nuclear generation?
机译:关于美国“最佳”发电来源的持续辩论表面上涉及经济学,但是很明显,减少碳排放是美国能源政策的目标。传统的碳生产燃料是成本最低的发电来源。现在的问题是,哪个发电来源以最低的成本生产低碳的电力?总的来说,关于发电经济学的讨论实际上是出于个人利益。一个小组高度重视清洁能源,而另一个小组则重视创造就业机会。生产者寻求获利,而社会活动家则为经济上处于弱势的人们珍视低价。显然,没有任何一代人能“赢得”这场辩论。核电会成为无碳发电行业的一部分吗?更重要的是,客户是否愿意为无碳核发电付费?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear news》 |2015年第8期|24-25|共2页
  • 作者

    Linda C. Byus;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号