首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Engineering International >Are we paying too much to reduce radiological risk?
【24h】

Are we paying too much to reduce radiological risk?

机译:我们是否为降低放射风险付出了太多?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 2000, the DoE budget request to Congress included $5.9 billion for Environmental Management (EM) and $154 million for Environmental Safety and Health (ES&H). The former includes all clean-up activities for past defence activities. The latter deals primarily with workers' safety and health. However, EM also has some expenditures related to worker safety. There have been several studies discussing DoE-generated risks to budget proposals and expenditures. However, these have dealt with the subject in a general way, and have not directly related expenditures to total risks of a DoE site or sites.
机译:2000年,美国能源部向国会提出的预算要求包括59亿美元用于环境管理(EM)和1.54亿美元用于环境安全与卫生(ES&H)。前者包括过去防御活动的所有清理活动。后者主要涉及工人的安全和健康。但是,EM也有一些与工人安全有关的支出。有几项研究讨论了能源部对预算提案和支出产生的风险。但是,这些已以一般方式处理了该主题,并且没有将支出与一个或多个DoE站点的总风险直接相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号