首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Engineering International >Enriching - or proliferating?
【24h】

Enriching - or proliferating?

机译:丰富-还是扩散?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The discussion on the future of uranium enrichment has now been resolved, for now at least, in favour of gas centrifuge technology, as already used on a commercial scale by Urenco and Russia. Laser enrichment is retained as a possibility for the future, but achieving substantial capacity at low operating costs has so far proved difficult. More recently, however, some new issues have come up which are relevant to the enrichment sector. Firstly, the recent rise in the uranium price (see article in April issue) means that there should be an increased demand for enrichment. This is because utilities have flexibility in choosing the relative amounts of uranium and enrichment to commit to produce enriched uranium - if one component becomes more expensive, it is logical to use more of the other. Secondly, much recent attention has focused on the quality of nuclear industry supply infrastructure, with the sudden realisation that it is perhaps rather more fragile than we thought.
机译:关于铀浓缩的未来的讨论现在已经解决了,至少目前是赞成使用气体离心技术,因为铀浓缩和俄罗斯已经在商业规模上使用了该技术。保留激光浓缩技术是未来的一种可能性,但是迄今为止,以较低的运营成本实现大量生产已证明是困难的。但是,最近出现了一些与浓缩行业有关的新问题。首先,最近铀价上涨(请参阅4月刊),这意味着对浓缩的需求应该增加。这是因为公用事业公司在选择铀的相对量和浓缩以承诺生产浓缩铀方面具有灵活性-如果一种成分变得更昂贵,则使用另一种成分是合乎逻辑的。第二,最近的注意力集中在核工业供应基础设施的质量上,突然意识到它可能比我们想象的要脆弱得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号