...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear Engineering and Design >Potential of Winkler type platform models for SSI problems considering flexibility of base mat
【24h】

Potential of Winkler type platform models for SSI problems considering flexibility of base mat

机译:考虑底垫灵活性的Winkler型平台模型在SSI问题上的潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Linear soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis seems to be well understood nowadays and can be performed, for example, by convenient combined asymptotic method (CAM). However, CAM is asymptotically accurate for rigid base mats only - this is a limitation. So, the additional research is needed to find out (a) what is the impact of the base mat's flexibility to the seismic response; (b) how can one account for this impact using the conventional tools. In the first part of the paper a sample "wave" solution is obtained in the frequency domain using SASSI2000 code, without CAM at all. Different formats of the seismic response (e.g., in-structure response spectra, soil-structure interaction forces, in-structure internal forces) have proved to have different sensitivity to the base mat's flexibility. In the second part of the paper this wave solution is a benchmark for the different "platform" models with "soil" springs and dashpots distributed over the base mat (this is a broad definition of Winkler type model). Different shapes of distribution, starting from the conventional Winkler's flat shape and up to the "optimal" shape, are compared to each other in the second part of the paper. It is shown that even the most advanced "shaped" models of the Winkler type are limited in their ability to reproduce seismic response in the most sensitive format - the internal forces in the mat. This is the result of (a) local nature of Winkler's model, and (b) frequency independence of its' parameters.
机译:线性土壤-结构相互作用(SSI)分析现在似乎很容易理解,并且可以通过例如方便的组合渐近方法(CAM)进行。但是,CAM仅对于刚性基垫渐近精确-这是一个限制。因此,需要进行额外的研究以找出(a)基垫的柔韧性对地震反应的影响是什么; (b)使用传统工具如何解决这一影响?在本文的第一部分中,使用SASSI2000代码在频域中获得了样本“波动”解决方案,而根本没有CAM。地震响应的不同格式(例如,结构内响应谱,土壤-结构相互作用力,结构内内力)已证明对基垫的柔韧性有不同的敏感性。在本文的第二部分中,该波动解决方案是不同“平台”模型的基准,这些模型的“土壤”弹簧和减震器分布在基垫上(这是Winkler型模型的广义定义)。在本文的第二部分中,将比较了从常规Winkler的扁平形状到“最佳”形状的不同分布形状。结果表明,即使是最先进的Winkler型“成形”模型,其以最敏感的格式(垫子中的内力)再现地震响应的能力也受到限制。这是由于(a)Winkler模型的局部性质,以及(b)其参数的频率独立性的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nuclear Engineering and Design》 |2013年第10期|18-31|共14页
  • 作者

    Alexander Tyapin;

  • 作者单位

    Atomenergoproject, 7/1 Bakuninskaya Street, Moscow 105005, Russia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号