首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >Views Your letters
【24h】

Views Your letters

机译:查看您的信件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As a linguist, I, er, found David Robson's article quite, uh, interesting. But, mmm, maybe starting from Justin Trudeau was, like, not a good idea. Language has evolved with a range of expectations. We expect private conversations to be punctuated with meaningless sounds, as they are an indication that we are taking the other person seriously. They are saying: "I am processing what you said. In responding to it, I do so with some hesitation because I am still thinking about it." On the other hand, we expect public figures standing up to speak on a major issue to have already reflected on it and to have organised their thoughts into a coherent whole. There are no uhs or ers in the Gettysburg Address. So Trudeau wasn't, in fact, speaking like a pro. He was treating a public occasion like a private conversation and using the wrong linguistic register.
机译:作为一个语言学家,我,呃,发现大卫罗士森的文章相当,呃,有趣。但是,MMM,也许从贾斯汀Trudeau开始,就像,不是一个好主意。语言已经发展出了一系列期望。我们预计私人对话会被毫无意义的声音打折,因为它们是我们正在认真地接受对方的迹象。他们说:“我正在处理你所说的。在回应它时,我会犹豫不决,因为我还在考虑它。”另一方面,我们预计公众人物会讲述一个主要问题,以便已经反映在它上面并使他们的思想组织成一个连贯的整体。 Gettysburg地址中没有UHS或ERS。所以Trudeau实际上并不像专业人士那样说话。他正在像私人对话一样对待公共场合,并使用错误的语言登记册。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2020年第3307期|28-28|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:15:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号