首页> 外文期刊>New Political Science >When the Past is Not Prologue: The Wagner Act Debates and the Limits of American Political Science
【24h】

When the Past is Not Prologue: The Wagner Act Debates and the Limits of American Political Science

机译:当过去不是序幕时:瓦格纳法案的辩论和美国政治学的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The debates over the Wagner Act could have represented a key moment in the ongoing development of the discipline of American Political Science, as neo-Marxist and related class analyses of American politics began to be taken seriously. Instead the debates have been forgotten, and neo-Marxism remains as marginalized as ever. This article examines how one influential scholar, Theda Skocpol, successfully characterized neo-Marxism as hopelessly reductionist and functionalist. Despite successful rebuttals to Skocpol's arguments by Michael Goldfield in particular, the discipline proved more than willing to continue to ignore what neo-Marxism had to offer.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2012.703854
机译:《瓦格纳法案》的辩论可能代表了美国政治科学学科不断发展的关键时刻,因为新马克思主义和有关美国政治的相关阶级分析开始受到重视。相反,辩论被遗忘了,新马克思主义仍然像以往一样被边缘化。本文探讨了一位有影响力的学者Theda Skocpol如何成功地将新马克思主义描述为无可救药的还原主义者和功能主义者。尽管特别成功地驳斥了迈克尔·戈德菲尔德(Michael Goldfield)的斯科科普(Skocpol)的论点,但该学科仍然愿意继续忽略新马克思主义所提供的内容。查看全文下载全文“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2012.703854

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号