首页> 外文期刊>New library world >Research methods used in library and information science during the 1970-2010
【24h】

Research methods used in library and information science during the 1970-2010

机译:1970-2010年间在图书馆和情报学中使用的研究方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to explore research methods used in Library and Information Science (LIS) during the past four decades. The goal is to compile a annotated bibliography of seminal works of the discipline used in different countries and social contexts. Design/methodology/approach - When comparing areas and types of research, different publication patterns are taken into account. As we can see, data indicators and types of studies carried out on scientific activity contribute very little when evaluating the real response potential to identified problems. Therefore, among other things, LIS needs new methodological developments, which should combine qualitative and quantitative approaches and allow a better understanding of the nature and characteristics of science in different countries. Findings - The conclusion is that LIS emerges strictly linked to descriptive methodologies, channeled to meet the challenges of professional practice through empirical strategies of a professional nature, which manifests itself the preponderance of a professional paradigm that turns out to be an indicator of poor scientific discipline development. Research limitations/implications - This, undoubtedly, reflects the reality of Anglo-Saxon countries, reproduced in most of the recognized journals of the field; this issue plus the chosen instruments for data collection certainly slant the results. Originality/value - The development of taxonomies in the discipline cannot be left aside from the accepted by the rest of the scientific community, at least if LIS desires to be integrated and recognized as a scientific discipline.
机译:目的-本文旨在探讨过去40年中在图书馆和情报学(LIS)中使用的研究方法。目的是汇编在不同国家和社会背景下使用的该学科开创性著作的带注释的书目。设计/方法/方法-比较研究领域和类型时,要考虑不同的出版模式。我们可以看到,在评估对已发现问题的实际反应潜力时,数据指标和针对科学活动进行的研究类型的贡献很小。因此,除其他外,LIS需要新的方法学发展,应将定性和定量方法相结合,并能更好地理解不同国家科学的性质和特征。调查结果-结论是,LIS的出现与描述性方法紧密相关,通过专业性质的经验策略引导其应对专业实践的挑战,这本身就表明了专业范式的优势,事实证明这是不良科学学科的指标发展。研究的局限性/意义-毫无疑问,这反映了盎格鲁-撒克逊国家的现实,并在该领域大多数公认的期刊上都有刊登;这个问题加上选择的数据收集工具肯定会使结果倾斜。原创性/价值-至少在LIS希望被整合并被认可为一门科学学科的情况下,该学科分类法的发展不能被其他科学界所接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号