首页> 外文期刊>New Forests >Influence of herbicides and felling, fertilization, and prescribed fire on longleaf pine growth and understory vegetation through ten growing seasons and the outcome of an ensuing wildfire
【24h】

Influence of herbicides and felling, fertilization, and prescribed fire on longleaf pine growth and understory vegetation through ten growing seasons and the outcome of an ensuing wildfire

机译:除草剂和砍伐,施肥和明火对十个生长季节中长叶松树生长和林下植被的影响以及随之而来的野火结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Restoring longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) over much of its original range requires artificial regeneration. In central Louisiana, USA, two fertilization levels—No (NF) or Yes (F-36 kg/ha N and 40 kg/ha P) in combination with three vegetation treatments—Check, four prescribed fires (PF), or multi-year vegetation control by herbicidal and mechanical means (IVM) were applied to container-grown longleaf pine plantings in a grass savanna. After 10 years, P concentration in longleaf pine foliage was less on NF plots than F plots, but fertilization did not significantly affect tree stature. Survival was greater on NF plots than F plots, and so, NF plots were more productive (NF—63 m3/ha and F—45 m3/ha). Pine trees on IVM plots (37 dm3/tree) were significantly larger than on Check and PF plots, which averaged 17 dm3/tree. Survival was better on IVM plots (88%) than PF plots (78%), which was better than Checks (58%). Consequently, IVM plots were most productive (99 m3/ha), followed by PF plots (44 m3/ha), and lastly Checks (28 m3/ha). PF plots had greater grass cover (38%) than Check and IVM plots, which averaged 5%, whereas PF and IVM plots had less understory arborescent cover (an average of 25%) than Checks (91%). A wildfire in March 2007 reduced pine survival by 22, 14, and 1 percentage points on IVM, Check, and PF plots, respectively. Seven months later, longleaf pine production had decreased to 92 m3/ha on IVM plots while increasing to 55 m3/ha on PF plots and 30 m3/ha on Checks. Overall, the wildfire rejuvenated the herbaceous plant community. Grass cover on Check and IVM plots averaged 20% while grass cover on PF plots was 36%. Forb cover increased on all treatments from 2% before the wildfire to 13% seven months after the wildfire. Understory arborescent cover decreased on Checks to 62% but increased slightly on PF and IVM plots and averaged 30%.
机译:在大部分原始范围内恢复长叶松木(Pinus palustris Mill。)都需要人工再生。在美国路易斯安那州中部,两种施肥水平-否(NF)或是(F-36 kg / ha N和40 kg / ha P)结合三种植被处理方法-Check,四次明火(PF)或多次施肥通过除草和机械方法(IVM)进行一年的植被控制,将其应用于草大草原上的容器生长的长叶松树种植。 10年后,NF地块上长叶松树叶子中的P浓度低于F地块,但施肥并没有显着影响树形。 NF图上的生存期比F图上的生存期大,因此NF图的生产力更高(NF-63 m 3 / ha和F-45 m 3 / ha)。 IVM图上的松树(37 dm 3 /树)显着大于Check和PF图上的松树,平均为17 dm 3 /树。在IVM地块(88%)上,生存率要好于PF(78%),而在Checks(58%)上要好。因此,IVM图的生产率最高(99 m 3 / ha),其次是PF图(44 m 3 / ha),最后是Checks(28 m 3 / ha)。 PF地块的草覆盖率(38%)比Check和IVM地块(平均5%)大,而PF和IVM地块的林下乔木覆盖率(平均25%)比Checks(91%)少。在IVM,Check和PF图上,2007年3月的一场野火分别使松树存活率降低了22、14和1个百分点。七个月后,IVM田地上的长叶松树产量下降至92 m 3 / ha,而PF田地和30 m 3上产量增长至55 m 3 / ha / ha检查。总体而言,野火使草本植物群落恢复了活力。 Check和IVM地块的草皮平均为20%,而PF地块的草皮为36%。在所有处理中,Forb的覆盖率从野火前的2%增加到野火后七个月的13%。在Checks上,地下乔木覆盖率下降到62%,但在PF和IVM图上略有增加,平均为30%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号