...
首页> 外文期刊>Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on >Causality Analysis of Neural Connectivity: Critical Examination of Existing Methods and Advances of New Methods
【24h】

Causality Analysis of Neural Connectivity: Critical Examination of Existing Methods and Advances of New Methods

机译:神经连通性的因果关系分析:现有方法的批判性检验和新方法的进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular measures to reveal causality influence of time series and has been widely applied in economics and neuroscience. Especially, its counterpart in frequency domain, spectral GC, as well as other Granger-like causality measures have recently been applied to study causal interactions between brain areas in different frequency ranges during cognitive and perceptual tasks. In this paper, we show that: 1) GC in time domain cannot correctly determine how strongly one time series influences the other when there is directional causality between two time series, and 2) spectral GC and other Granger-like causality measures have inherent shortcomings and/or limitations because of the use of the transfer function (or its inverse matrix) and partial information of the linear regression model. On the other hand, we propose two novel causality measures (in time and frequency domains) for the linear regression model, called new causality and new spectral causality, respectively, which are more reasonable and understandable than GC or Granger-like measures. Especially, from one simple example, we point out that, in time domain, both new causality and GC adopt the concept of proportion, but they are defined on two different equations where one equation (for GC) is only part of the other (for new causality), thus the new causality is a natural extension of GC and has a sound conceptual/theoretical basis, and GC is not the desired causal influence at all. By several examples, we confirm that new causality measures have distinct advantages over GC or Granger-like measures. Finally, we conduct event-related potential causality analysis for a subject with intracranial depth electrodes undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery, and show that, in the frequency domain, all measures reveal significant directional event-related causality, but the result from new spectral causality is consistent with event-related time–frequency power spec trum activity. The spectral GC as well as other Granger-like measures are shown to generate misleading results. The proposed new causality measures may have wide potential applications in economics and neuroscience.
机译:格兰杰因果关系(GC)是揭示时间序列因果关系影响的最受欢迎的措施之一,已广泛应用于经济学和神经科学领域。特别是,它的频域对应物,频谱GC以及其他类似Granger的因果关系措施最近已用于研究认知和知觉任务中不同频率范围内的大脑区域之间的因果关系。在本文中,我们表明:1)当两个时间序列之间存在因果关系时,时域中的GC无法正确确定一个时间序列对另一时间序列的影响程度,以及2)光谱GC和其他类似于Granger的因果关系度量方法具有固有的缺陷和/或限制,因为使用了传递函数(或其逆矩阵)和线性回归模型的部分信息。另一方面,我们为线性回归模型提出了两个新颖的因果关系度量(在时域和频域),分别称为新因果关系和新频谱因果关系,它们比GC或类似Granger的度量更为合理和易于理解。特别是,从一个简单的示例中,我们指出,在时域上,新因果关系和GC都采用了比例的概念,但是它们是在两个不同的方程式上定义的,其中一个方程式(对于GC)只是另一个方程式(对于新因果关系),因此新因果关系是GC的自然延伸,并具有可靠的概念/理论基础,GC根本不是所需的因果影响。通过几个例子,我们证实了新的因果关系测度比GC或类似Granger测度具有明显的优势。最后,我们对接受颅内深度电极评估的癫痫手术患者进行事件相关的潜在因果关系分析,结果表明,在频域中,所有测量均显示出显着的定向事件相关的因果关系,但新的频谱因果关系是与事件相关的时频功率谱的活动一致。光谱GC以及其他类似Granger的测量方法均会产生误导性结果。拟议的新因果措施可能在经济学和神经科学中具有广泛的潜在应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号