【24h】

Q & A

机译:问与答

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Absolutely, because we believe that approach will enable customers to leverage existing infrastructure which may or may not be from IBM, and that only through the adoption of standards can you truly lower cost. Truth be told, I think you'll find different answers at IBM depending on who you talk to. But let me give you a customer perspective and tell you what we're doing from a product perspective. There are two parts to an FCoE solution. There is a lossless Ethernet transport and there is supporting the Fibre Channel protocols on top of that. Those Fibre Channel protocols could either be basic NPIV or it could be full director class switching. We have been supporting lossless Ethernet transport ever since we got into the top-of-rack business, which was late 2008. Starting in the first half of 2012 we will start to enable customers of our lossless Ethernet top-of-rack switches to break out Fibre Channel and connect to their favorite Brocade or Cisco Fibre Channel.
机译:绝对如此,因为我们相信这种方法将使客户能够利用可能来自或可能不来自IBM的现有基础架构,并且只有通过采用标准,您才能真正降低成本。说实话,我认为您会根据与谁交谈而在IBM找到不同的答案。但是,让我给您一个客户角度,并从产品角度告诉您我们在做什么。 FCoE解决方案包括两部分。以太网传输是无损的,并且还支持光纤通道协议。这些光纤通道协议可以是基本的NPIV,也可以是完整的Director类切换。自从我们进入2008年底的架顶式业务以来,我们就一直在支持无损以太网传输。从2012年上半年开始,我们将开始使无损以太网架顶式交换机的客户脱颖而出。光纤通道并连接到他们最喜欢的Brocade或Cisco光纤通道。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Network world》 |2012年第4期|p.16|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号