首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
【24h】

Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe

机译:估算非药剂干预对欧洲Covid-19的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Modelling based on pooled data from 11 European countries indicates that non-pharmaceutical interventions-particularly lockdowns-have had a marked effect on SARS-CoV-2 transmission, driving the reproduction number of the infection below 1.Following the detection of the new coronavirus(1)severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its spread outside of China, Europe has experienced large epidemics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response, many European countries have implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as the closure of schools and national lockdowns. Here we study the effect of major interventions across 11 European countries for the period from the start of the COVID-19 epidemics in February 2020 until 4 May 2020, when lockdowns started to be lifted. Our model calculates backwards from observed deaths to estimate transmission that occurred several weeks previously, allowing for the time lag between infection and death. We use partial pooling of information between countries, with both individual and shared effects on the time-varying reproduction number (R-t). Pooling allows for more information to be used, helps to overcome idiosyncrasies in the data and enables more-timely estimates. Our model relies on fixed estimates of some epidemiological parameters (such as the infection fatality rate), does not include importation or subnational variation and assumes that changes inR(t)are an immediate response to interventions rather than gradual changes in behaviour. Amidst the ongoing pandemic, we rely on death data that are incomplete, show systematic biases in reporting and are subject to future consolidation. We estimate that-for all of the countries we consider here-current interventions have been sufficient to driveR(t)below 1 (probabilityR(t) 1.0 is greater than 99%) and achieve control of the epidemic. We estimate that across all 11 countries combined, between 12 and 15 million individuals were infected with SARS-CoV-2 up to 4 May 2020, representing between 3.2% and 4.0% of the population. Our results show that major non-pharmaceutical interventions-and lockdowns in particular-have had a large effect on reducing transmission. Continued intervention should be considered to keep transmission of SARS-CoV-2 under control.
机译:基于来自11个欧洲国家的汇总数据的建模表明,非药物干预 - 特别是锁定 - 对SARS-COV-2透射有明显影响,驱动下面的感染的再现数。义冠状动脉的检测( 1)严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)及其在中国以外的展开,欧洲经历了冠状病毒疾病2019年大量流行病(Covid-19)。作为回应,许多欧洲国家已实施非药剂干预措施,例如学校和国家锁定的关闭。在这里,我们研究了11月20日到2020年5月4日锁定开始升降的欧洲行为欧洲国家的主要干预措施的主要干预措施的影响。我们的模型从观察到的死亡后向后计算,以估计前几周的传播,允许感染和死亡之间的时间滞后。我们使用各国之间的信息汇集信息,并对时变的再现号码(R-T)进行个人和共享影响。池允许使用更多信息,有助于克服数据中的特质,并启用更及时的估计。我们的模型依赖于某些流行病学参数的固定估计(例如感染死亡率),不包括进口或地区变化,并假设变化INR(T)是对干预措施的立即响应,而不是行为的逐步变化。在持续的大流行中,我们依靠不完整的死亡数据,在报告中显示系统的偏见,并受到未来的整合。我们估计,对于我们考虑的所有国家,我们考虑的主要干预足以达到下面的驱动程序(T)(概率(T)<1.0大于99%)并实现对流行病的控制。我们估计,在所有11个国家合并,12至1500万个国家患有4月20日至5月4日的SARS-COV-2,占人口的3.2%和4.0%。我们的研究结果表明,特别是重大的非药物干预和锁模对减少传输产生了很大的影响。应考虑继续进行干预以防止SARS-COV-2。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2020年第7820期|257-261|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Imperial Coll London Dept Math London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London Dept Math London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London Dept Math London England;

    Imperial Coll London Dept Math London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London Dept Math London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England|Univ Oxford Dept Stat Oxford England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

    Imperial Coll London MRC Ctr Global Infect Dis Anal JameeL Inst Dis & Emergency AnaLyt London England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:15:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号