首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Up in the air
【24h】

Up in the air

机译:在空中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is hardly surprising that climate discussions tend to gloss over uncertainties in data on greenhouse-gas emissions. Governments are struggling towards an international agreement to reduce those emissions, and their focus is necessarily on coming up with specific, enforceable targets. But the fact is that scientists' ability to measure emissions and verify that countries are following through on their commitments is far from adequate. And that is unlikely to change without the full engagement of governments and scientists.rnThere are a number of reasons to be sceptical about current emissions data (see page 18). Some are a matter of human frailty: it is often in the best interests of both companies and governments to underestimate emissions, and thus to overstate the effectiveness of a given technology or policy in reducing them. That temptation will only increase as countries ramp up climate commitments. Other reasons, however, hinge on the uncertainties inherent in even the best emissions statistics.
机译:毫无疑问,气候讨论往往掩盖了温室气体排放数据中的不确定性。各国政府正在努力达成减少这些排放的国际协议,它们的重点必然是提出具体的,可执行的目标。但是事实是,科学家测量排放量并验证各国是否遵守其承诺的能力远远不够。而且,如果没有政府和科学家的充分参与,这种改变是不可能的。rn有许多理由对当前的排放数据持怀疑态度(请参阅第18页)。有些问题是人为的脆弱:低估排放量并因此高估了给定技术或政策减少排放的有效性通常符合公司和政府的最大利益。这种诱惑只会随着各国对气候承诺的增加而增加。但是,其他原因还取决于最佳排放统计数据固有的不确定性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2010年第7294期|p.9-10|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号