首页> 外文期刊>Nature >A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors
【24h】

A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors

机译:车里雅宾斯克上空发生500公里的爆炸,小型撞击器带来更大的危害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most large (over a kilometre in diameter) near-Earth asteroids are now known, but recognition that airbursts (or fireballs resulting from nuclear-weapon-sized detonations of meteoroids in the atmosphere) have the potential to do greater damage than previously thought has shifted an increasing portion of the residual impact risk (the risk of impact from an unknown object) to smaller objects. Above the threshold size of impactor at which the atmosphere absorbs sufficient energy to prevent a ground impact, most of the damage is thought to be caused by the airburst shock wave, but owing to lack of observations this is uncertain. Here we report an analysis of the damage from the airburst of an asteroid about 19 metres (17 to 20 metres) in diameter southeast of Chelyabinsk, Russia, on 15 February 2013, estimated to have an energy equivalent of approximately 500 (± 100) kilotons of trinitrotoluene (TNT, where 1 kiloton of TNT =4.185×10~(12) joules). We show that a widely referenced technique of estimating airburst damage does not reproduce the observations, and that the mathematical relations based on the effects of nuclear weapons-almost always used with this technique-overestimate blast damage. This suggests that earlier damage estimates near the threshold impactor size are too high. We performed a global survey of airbursts of a kiloton or more (including Chelyabinsk), and find that the number of impactors with diameters of tens of metres may be an order of magnitude higher than estimates based on other techniques. This suggests a non-equilibrium (if the population were in a long-term collisional steady state the size-frequency distribution would either follow a single power law or there must be a size-dependent bias in other surveys) in the near-Earth asteroid population for objects 10 to 50 metres in diameter, and shifts more of the residual impact risk to these sizes.
机译:现在已知大多数大型(直径超过一公里)的近地小行星,但认识到,爆炸(或核武器大小的流星体在大气中爆炸产生的火球)造成的破坏力可能比以前认为的要大剩余撞击风险(来自未知物体的撞击风险)到较小物体的比例越来越大。高于撞击器的阈值大小(在该阈值大小下,大气层吸收了足够的能量以防止地面撞击),大部分损坏被认为是由空爆冲击波引起的,但是由于缺乏观察,这是不确定的。在这里,我们报告了2013年2月15日,俄罗斯车里雅宾斯克东南部直径约19米(17至20米)的小行星爆炸所致的破坏,估计其能量当量约为500(±100)千克三硝基甲苯(TNT,其中1吨TNT = 4.185×10〜(12)焦耳)。我们表明,估算空爆破坏的广泛引用的技术无法重现这些观察结果,并且基于核武器影响的数学关系(几乎总是与该技术结合使用)会高估爆炸破坏。这表明,接近阈值撞击器尺寸的早期损伤估计值过高。我们对一千公斤或更多(包括车里雅宾斯克)的空袭进行了一次全球调查,发现直径数十米的撞击器数量可能比其他技术的估计值高一个数量级。这表明近地小行星存在非平衡(如果种群处于长期碰撞稳态,则大小-频率分布要么遵循单一幂定律,要么在其他测量中必须存在与大小有关的偏差)。直径10到50米的物体的数量增加,并将更多的剩余撞击风险转移到这些大小。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2013年第7475期|238-241|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada,Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N 6A5B7,Canada;

    Commissariat a I' Energie Atomique,Departement Analyse Surveillance Environnement(CEA/DAM/DIF),Bruyeres-le-Chatel, 91297 Arpajon Cedex, France;

    Laboratory for Atmospheric Acoustics, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0225, USA;

    Marshall Information Technology Services (MITS)/Dynetics Technical Services, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA;

    Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA;

    Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ 251 65 Ondrejov, Czech Republic;

    Commissariat a I' Energie Atomique,Departement Analyse Surveillance Environnement(CEA/DAM/DIF),Bruyeres-le-Chatel, 91297 Arpajon Cedex, France;

    International Data Center, Provisional Technical Secretariat, Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, PO Box 1200, A-1400 Vienna, Austria;

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Stilleweg 2,30655 Hannover, Germany;

    Meteoroid Environments Office, EV44, Space Environment Team, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA;

    Laboratory for Atmospheric Acoustics, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0225, USA;

    Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, Washington DC 20375, USA;

    Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Hazard Information Service, 7 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario Kl A0Y3, Canada;

    Seismology Division, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Wilhelminalaan 10,3732 GK De Bilt,The Netherlands,Department of Geoscience and Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1,2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands;

    Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii,Manoa 73-4460 Queen Kaahumanu Highway, 119 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740-2638, USA;

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Laboratory for Atmospheric Acoustics, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0225, USA;

    ERC Incorporated/Jacobs ESSSA Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA;

    Laboratory for Atmospheric Acoustics, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0225, USA;

    Commissariat a I' Energie Atomique,Departement Analyse Surveillance Environnement(CEA/DAM/DIF),Bruyeres-le-Chatel, 91297 Arpajon Cedex, France;

    International Data Center, Provisional Technical Secretariat, Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, PO Box 1200, A-1400 Vienna, Austria;

    Marshall Information Technology Services (MITS)/Dynetics Technical Services, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA;

    Meteoroid Environments Office, EV44, Space Environment Team, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA;

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Seismology Division, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Wilhelminalaan 10,3732 GK De Bilt,The Netherlands,Department of Geoscience and Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1,2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands;

    Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA;

    Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ 251 65 Ondrejov, Czech Republic;

    ET Space Systems, 5990 Worth Way, Camarillo, California 93012, USA;

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;

    Los Alamos National Laboratory, EES-17 MS F665, PO Box 1663 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA;

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号