首页> 外文期刊>Nature >The porous frontier
【24h】

The porous frontier

机译:多孔边界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In Exodus, Paul Colliers objective is to initiate an evidence-based debate about international migration and debunk the biases - especially among liberal thinkers' -that he says make such a debate taboo. Worldwide, about 3% of people live in a country other than that of their birth, but in England and Wales, for example, that proportion is 13% and rising. Collier argues that liberal elites wilfully ignore the views of ordinary citizens, who think that this influx can undermine society and the economy. He provides an analytical framework to account for migration, surveys some of the evidence, identifies supposed intellectual biases and offers policy conclusions. Collier makes many powerful and thought-provoking points accessibly, and migration scholars would mostly agree with his analysis. But his contribution to the debate is weakened by occasional lapses in consistency, citation and tolerance for opposing views (including mine). For example, Collier argues that the policy question is not whether migration is good or bad, but whether a bit more of it is desirable.
机译:在《出埃及记》中,保罗·科利里斯(Paul Colliers)的目标是发起关于国际移民的循证辩论,并揭穿偏见,尤其是自由思想家的偏见,他说这是辩论的禁忌。在世界范围内,约有3%的人生活在出生后以外的国家,但例如在英格兰和威尔士,这一比例为13%,并且还在上升。科利尔认为,自由派精英会无视普通公民的意见,他们认为这种大量涌入会破坏社会和经济。他提供了一个分析框架来说明移民问题,调查了一些证据,确定了所谓的智力偏见并提供了政策结论。科利尔提出了许多有力和发人深省的观点,移民学者大多同意他的分析。但是,由于在一致性,引用和对反对观点(包括我的观点)的容忍度方面的偶尔失误,削弱了他对辩论的贡献。例如,科利尔(Collier)认为,政策问题不是迁移是好是坏,而是是否需要更多迁移。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2013年第7470期|165-166|共2页
  • 作者

    L.Alan Winters;

  • 作者单位

    University of Sussex,Brighton, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号