首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Research >Natural Resource Wealth Optimization: A Review of Fiscal Regimes and Equitable Agreements for Petroleum and Mineral Extraction Projects
【24h】

Natural Resource Wealth Optimization: A Review of Fiscal Regimes and Equitable Agreements for Petroleum and Mineral Extraction Projects

机译:优化自然资源财富:石油和矿产开采项目的财政制度和公平协议的回顾

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This review highlights the challenges of fiscal system optimization considering both the host government and extraction company perspectives. Countries around the world face an arduous task in determining the optimal fiscal system to maximize the capture of economic rents of natural resource extraction activities. The extraction industry is equally challenged to meet global commodity demand because the capital investments required for developing new hydrocarbon fields and ore mines are on the rise, while tax takes on extraction activities tend to rise too in many frontier jurisdictions. Normal profit must remain for the extraction companies, and returns must be large enough to replace for resource depletion. Companies use the benefits of resources produced in one country to finance capital investments for future field development in another country. One viewpoint is that profits are expatriated to the detriment of the host country and to the benefit of another country or the world supply chain as a whole. Another viewpoint is that all resource holders benefit because a foreign entity always starts in a new resource holding nation by investing in the development of an oil field or solid mineral mine using the profits from previous projects in other countries. A key question is What is a fair taxation regime for natural resource extraction in a particular geological setting and a given geographical location, taking into account subsurface uncertainty about the quality and volume of the resource, infrastructure needs and proximity to the world’s major markets and trade centers? Tax distortion could go both ways: either incentivize, attract and stimulate or des-incentivize, repel and deter resource development. Additional factors to consider are external uncertainties such as political and fiscal stability, sovereign risk and even local weather conditions (mostly in offshore and Arctic petroleum operations). Governments must tax the upstream rents of petroleum and mineral resources, but not to the level that suppresses extraction activities. All stakeholders want at least an equitable share of the profits. Defining what is equitable is a matter of intensive negotiations, renegotiation of prior agreements and sometimes litigation and international arbitration. Several case studies, covering both petroleum and solid mineral extraction projects, are included to highlight the key points involved in fiscal policies designed to optimize the utility of geological resource endowments. For example, the offshore tax regime employed in the US pivots the trade-offs between fiscal incentives and long-term resource supply to ensure energy security. This review concludes with a call for further research.
机译:这篇综述着重从东道国政府和采掘公司的角度出发,优化了财政系统的挑战。在确定最佳财政制度以最大程度地获取自然资源开采活动的经济租金方面,世界各国面临艰巨的任务。开采业同样面临着满足全球商品需求的挑战,因为开发新的油气田和矿山所需的资本投资正在增加,而在许多边境管辖区,开采活动的税收往往也增加了。开采公司必须保持正常利润,收益必须足够大以替代资源枯竭。公司利用在一个国家生产的资源的收益为在另一个国家进行未来油田开发的资本投资提供资金。一种观点认为,利润流失给东道国,并损害了另一个国家或整个世界的供应链。另一个观点是,所有资源持有人都会从中受益,因为外国实体总是通过利用其他国家先前项目的利润投资油田或固体矿山的开发来开始在新的资源持有国中成立。一个关键问题是,考虑到地下资源的质量和数量,基础设施需求以及与世界主要市场和贸易的接近性的不确定性,什么是在特定地质环境和给定地理位置下对自然资源开采实行公平的税收制度?中心?税收扭曲可以双向发展:激励,吸引和刺激或去激励,排斥和阻止资源开发。需要考虑的其他因素是外部不确定性,例如政治和财政稳定,主权风险甚至本地天气情况(主要是在近海和北极石油作业中)。各国政府必须对石油和矿产资源的上游租金征税,但不得压制抑制开采活动的水平。所有利益相关者都希望至少获得公平的利润份额。界定什么是公平的问题,需要进行深入的谈判,重新谈判先前的协定,有时还要进行诉讼和国际仲裁。包括几个案例研究,涵盖了石油和固体矿产开采项目,以强调旨在优化地质资源end赋效用的财政政策中的关键点。例如,美国采用的离岸税制在财政激励措施和长期资源供应之间进行取舍,以确保能源安全。这篇综述最后呼吁进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号