首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Research >Cost Analysis and Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts of Three Value-Added Novel Bioproducts: Processing and Production
【24h】

Cost Analysis and Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts of Three Value-Added Novel Bioproducts: Processing and Production

机译:三种增值新型生物产品的成本分析和生命周期环境影响:加工和生产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A life-cycle assessment framework was used to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with processing, producing, and marketing three novel value-added bioproducts, intended as substitutes for peat growing media and soil amendments, namely: dried composted forestry bark (DCFB); dehydrated topdressing (DTD); and organic bio-fertilizer (OBF). Total cost of processing and producing the final bioproducts ($ t−1) was highest for OBF and lowest for DCFB. Environmental and ecological impacts were quantified and compared using indicators commonly used in the scholarly literature to capture global warming, and human and eco-toxicity impacts. Global warming impacts (measured in terms of total CO2-equivalent of dehydrated final bioproduct) were highest for OBF, followed by DTD, and then DCFB. Among the human and eco-toxicity indicators considered, NO x emissions were highest, followed by SO2, and lowest for CO emissions, for all three bioproducts.
机译:一个生命周期评估框架用于评估与加工,生产和销售三种新型增值生物产品有关的环境影响,这三种生物产品旨在替代泥炭生长介质和土壤改良剂,即:干堆肥林木(DCFB);脱水追肥(DTD);和有机生物肥料(OBF)。最终生物产品的加工和生产总成本(t-1)对于OBF最高,而对于DCFB最低。使用学术文献中通常用来捕获全球变暖以及人类和生态毒性影响的指标对环境和生态影响进行了量化和比较。对于OBF,全球变暖影响(以脱水最终生物产品的总CO2当量衡量)最高,其次是DTD,然后是DCFB。在所考虑的人类和生态毒性指标中,所有三种生物产品的NOx排放量最高,其次是SO2,CO排放量最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号