首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards Review >Comparison of Light Detection and Ranging and National Elevation Dataset Digital Elevation Model on Floodplains of North Carolina
【24h】

Comparison of Light Detection and Ranging and National Elevation Dataset Digital Elevation Model on Floodplains of North Carolina

机译:北卡罗莱纳州洪泛区的光探测与测距和国家高程数据集数字高程模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

USGS national elevation dataset (NED) digital elevation model (DEM) data and four sets of light detection and ranging (LIDAR) DEMs were compared for Pitt County, North Carolina. The NED DEM has a spatial resolution of 30 X 30 m. Two sets of the LIDAR DEMs have a spatial resolution of 6.1 X 6.1 m and 15.2 X 15.2 m, respectively. To compare the DEMs spatially, two LIDAR DEMs were resampled into 30 X 30 m resolution. Statistically, the LIDAR DEMs were very similar to each other, and there was some difference with the LIDAR DEMs versus NED DEM. All five DEMs covering the floodplains between the cities of Greenville and Washington were then utilized to map a flood extent. The spatial patterns of individual categories on the maps agreed 87.4-95.0%. Finally, modeled inundation extents were examined against the 1999 flood event. The overall accuracy for selected flooded and nonflooded sites ranged 92.5-96.1%.
机译:比较了北卡罗来纳州皮特县的USGS国家海拔数据集(NED)数字高程模型(DEM)数据和四组光检测和测距(LIDAR)DEM。 NED DEM的空间分辨率为30 X 30 m。两组LIDAR DEM的空间分辨率分别为6.1 X 6.1 m和15.2 X 15.2 m。为了在空间上比较DEM,将两个LIDAR DEM重新采样为30 X 30 m分辨率。从统计上讲,激光雷达DEM彼此非常相似,并且激光雷达DEM与NED DEM之间存在一些差异。然后,利用覆盖格林维尔和华盛顿市之间的洪泛区的所有五个DEM来绘制洪水范围图。地图上各个类别的空间格局一致,为87.4-95.0%。最后,针对1999年的洪水事件检查了模拟淹没范围。选定的淹没和未淹没地点的总体准确度为92.5-96.1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号