首页> 外文期刊>Nationalities Papers >The country at a standstill: Yugoslavia and Slovene politics in the 1930s
【24h】

The country at a standstill: Yugoslavia and Slovene politics in the 1930s

机译:处于停滞状态的国家:1930年代的南斯拉夫和斯洛文尼亚政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

King Alexander's dictatorship in Yugoslavia (proclaimed in January 1929) was an expression of a real political need for consolidation in the country; however, in essence, it was an autocratic and repressive regime. More decisive moves toward a return of democracy did not occur, even later, after the replacement of his regime in June 1935. The political methods in the internal political life followed the pattern from the first half of the 1930s to the very eve of World War II. Such a situation also defined the relationship between the Slovenes and Yugoslavia. Slovene politics continued to look at the state from two angles - a unitary/centralist angle on the one hand and an autonomist/federalist angle on the other. Both camps (as well as other Yugoslav political players), however, failed to create an environment that would enable truly democratic compromises. The state was stuck at a “standstill,” but in spite of all its flaws, in the view of the Slovene political groups it represented the most suitable environment for the political and national life of Slovenes. Any serious political calculations that would go beyond this framework hardly existed.View full textDownload full textKeywordsKingdom of Yugoslavia, Slovenes, political history, dictatorship, twentieth centuryRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2010.549467
机译:亚历山大国王在南斯拉夫的独裁统治(于1929年1月宣布)是对该国巩固的真正政治需要的一种表达。但是,从本质上讲,这是一个专制和压制的政权。在1935年6月取代他的政权后,甚至没有采取更果断的民主回归举措。内部政治生活中的政治方法遵循从1930年代上半年到第二次世界大战前夕的模式。二。这种情况也确定了斯洛文尼亚和南斯拉夫之间的关系。斯洛文尼亚政治继续从两个角度看待国家-一方面是单一制/中央主义的角度,另一方面是自治主义者/联邦制的角度。但是,两个营地(以及其他南斯拉夫政治参与者)都没有创造出能够实现真正民主妥协的环境。国家处于“停滞状态”,但尽管存在种种缺陷,但在斯洛文尼亚政治团体看来,它代表了斯洛文尼亚政治和民族生活的最合适环境。几乎没有超出该框架的任何严肃的政治计算。查看全文下载全文关键字南斯拉夫王国,斯洛文尼亚,政治历史,独裁政权,二十世纪相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes, twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2010.549467

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号