首页> 外文期刊>NanoEthics >Responsible Management in Private Sector Nano Enterprises: Conversations with Lead Technologists and Managers
【24h】

Responsible Management in Private Sector Nano Enterprises: Conversations with Lead Technologists and Managers

机译:私营部门纳米企业的负责任管理:与主要技术人员和管理人员的对话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim was to learn about responsible management in private sector nano enterprises by telephone conversations with lead technologists and managers in companies in the US Midwest. The conversations took place between January and March of 2011. The marked increase starting in 2008 of prescriptive documents such as guidelines, codes of responsibility, and best practices in NanoEthicsBank offered an entry point for initiating the conversations. Had respondents noticed these documents and did they find them useful? Follow-up questions asked about the full life cycle of their products. The responses from 22 of the 25 organizations selected are categorized in 5 groups according to how they described their nano materials/business. A conception of responsible management in organizations is provided to underpin the analysis of the responses. This conception features virtues of concern, care, and foresight implied by a fundamental moral obligation. In the analysis, definitions from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the International Standards Organization (ISO) are used as a basis of comparison in assessing respondents' claims. Two important gaps are identified. One gap is between actual practices and the prescriptive use of the conception of responsible management in organizations. The other gap is between the actual use of nano terminology and OECD definitions.
机译:目的是通过与美国中西部公司的主要技术人员和经理进行电话交谈,了解私营部门纳米企业的负责任管理。对话在2011年1月至3月之间进行。从2008年开始,NanoEthicsBank中的指导性文件,准则,责任守则和最佳实践等说明性文件的显着增加为发起对话提供了切入点。被调查者是否注意到这些文件,是否发现它们有用?有关产品整个生命周期的后续问题。根据他们对纳米材料/业务的描述,从25个组织中选择了22个,将其分为5组。提供了组织中负责任的管理的概念以支持对响应的分析。这一概念具有基本道德义务所隐含的关心,关心和远见的优点。在分析中,经济合作与发展组织(OECD)和国际标准组织(ISO)的定义被用作评估受访者主张的比较基础。确定了两个重要的差距。实际做法与组织中负责任的管理概念的规定性使用之间存在一个鸿沟。另一个差距是纳米术语的实际使用与经合组织定义之间的差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号