首页> 外文期刊>NanoEthics >Chinese Public and Nanoresearchers' Perceptions of Benefits and Risks of Nanotechnology
【24h】

Chinese Public and Nanoresearchers' Perceptions of Benefits and Risks of Nanotechnology

机译:中国公众和纳米研究人员对纳米技术收益和风险的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public and experts' perceptions of benefits and risks of nanotechnology constitute an important element of nanoethics studies. On the one hand, compared with traditional ethics, nanoethics is a future-oriented ethics. The construction of ethical norms requires public participation. On the other hand, nanotechnology is characterized by uncertainty. Our previous research showed the Chinese public's support for nanotechnology was associated more with beliefs, including views of technology and the weighing of benefits and risks of nanotechnology, and less with knowledge about nanotechnology; the support was high but might change over time. Meanwhile, Chinese researchers have been actively conducting studies on nanotechnology while being highly aware of nanosafety issues. In this context, we further examined in the present study Chinese nanoresearchers' perceptions of specific benefits and risks of nanotechnology, compared them with those of the Chinese public, and examined the Chinese nanoresearchers' perceptions of risks of specific nanoapplications. Initial cross-regional comparisons were made with results from equivalent US and European surveys. Results showed Chinese nanoresearchers perceived a higher level of overall nanobenefits than the public and an almost equal level of overall nanorisks with the public. Four nanorisks were perceived by a higher proportion of experts than public; the experts likely relied on technical expertise while the public, possessing little knowledge about nanotechnology, might have exercised caution based on experiences and observations of other technologies. Of 23 nanoapplications, Chinese nanoresearchers regarded food using nanomaterials as the most risky and displays using nanomaterials as the least risky. Similarities and differences were observed in comparisons of Chinese with US and European survey results. In our age of technology and economic globalization, this research is of significance both for China's formulation of nanotechnology development strategies and for the further study on nanoethics and good governance of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology worldwide.
机译:公众和专家对纳米技术的益处和风险的认识是纳米伦理学研究的重要组成部分。一方面,与传统伦理相比,纳米伦理是面向未来的伦理。道德规范的建设需要公众参与。另一方面,纳米技术的特点是不确定性。我们以前的研究表明,中国公众对纳米技术的支持更多地与信念相关联,包括对技术的看法以及权衡纳米技术的利益,而较少与对纳米技术的了解有关。支持很高,但可能会随着时间而改变。同时,中国研究人员一直在高度关注纳米安全问题的同时积极开展纳米技术研究。在这种情况下,我们在本研究中进一步研究了中国纳米研究人员对纳米技术的特定利益和风险的看法,将其与中国公众进行了比较,并研究了中国纳米研究人员对特定纳米应用的风险的看法。最初的跨区域比较是根据美国和欧洲同等调查得出的结果进行的。结果表明,中国的纳米研究人员认为,整体纳米收益水平高于公众,而总体纳米风险与公众几乎相等。专家认为,四种纳米风险的比例要高于公众。专家可能会依靠技术专长,而对纳米技术知之甚少的公众可能会基于其他技术的经验和观察而谨慎行事。在23种纳米应用中,中国纳米研究人员认为使用纳米材料的食品风险最高,而使用纳米材料的展示风险最低。在将中国与美国和欧洲的调查结果进行比较时,观察到了异同。在当今技术和经济全球化的时代,这项研究对于中国制定纳米技术发展战略以及进一步研究纳米伦理学和全球新兴技术(如纳米技术)的善治具有重要意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《NanoEthics》 |2019年第3期|155-171|共17页
  • 作者

    Zhang Jing; Wang Guoyu;

  • 作者单位

    Dalian Univ Technol Dept Philosophy 2 Linggong Rd Dalian 116024 Peoples R China;

    Fudan Univ Sch Philosophy 220 Handan Rd Shanghai 200433 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Nanotechnology; Benefits; Risks; Public; Expert;

    机译:纳米技术;好处;风险;上市;专家;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:49:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号