...
首页> 外文期刊>Motion Imaging Journal, SMPTE >Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast
【24h】

Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast

机译:广播中的响度与语音归一化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents an empirical study of the differences between level normalization of programs using the two dominant methods: loudness normalization and speech (“dialog”) normalization. Instead of adding to the continuing debate of the subjective merits of one method over the other, important technical aspects are examined here. The difference in normalization level between the two measures was up to 14 dB. For all films and programs, the loudness method provided the greatest headroom. All programs and a majority of the films could be broadcast at a fixed target level of −24 LKFS (loudness, K-weighted, relative to full scale) without dynamics processing. When it was speech normalized, not a single film could be broadcast at that target level without applying dynamics processing. The study furthermore found a systematic difference between manual speech measurement and automatic speech measurement. Uncertainties in classification, definition, and measurement are described and compared to the requirements for precision in the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) and the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) loudness-based standards.
机译:本文对使用两种主要方法(响度归一化和语音(“对话”)归一化)的程序的级别归一化之间的差异进行了实证研究。这里不再研究一种方法相对于另一种方法的主观优点,而是在不断争论中,而是在这里研究重要的技术方面。两种措施之间的归一化水平差异最大为14 dB。对于所有电影和节目,响度方法提供了最大的扩展空间。无需动态处理,所有节目和大多数电影都可以以-24 LKFS(响度,K权重,相对于满刻度)的固定目标水平进行播放。将语音标准化后,如果不进行动态处理,则无法在该目标级别上播放任何电影。该研究还发现手动语音测量和自动语音测量之间存在系统差异。描述了分类,定义和测量的不确定性,并将它们与高级电视系统委员会(ATSC)和欧洲广播联盟(EBU)基于响度的标准中的精度要求进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号