首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >PluggedIN
【24h】

PluggedIN

机译:插入

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Welfare reform has had a high profile in the past couple of weeks courtesy of the NAO's negative assessment of the progress of Universal Credit and the public disagreement between a UN official and Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps over a report critical of reforms to housing benefit. Between the soundbites, one contribution to the debate which didn't receive the prominence it deserved was the 2013 State of the State report published by think-tank, Reform. One aspect of the report caught my eye. Public service leaders were questioning 'whether central government has assessed whether savings on welfare spending will be counterbalanced by increased demand on local services'. That chimed with concerns I have heard across the country from councillors and senior officers and the overwhelming feeling that central government has little idea what impact these changes are likely to have at local level.
机译:在过去的两周中,由于NAO对环球信贷进展的负面评估以及联合国官员与保守党主席格兰特·沙普斯之间就批评住房福利改革的报告产生的公众分歧,福利改革受到了广泛关注。在这些声音之间,对辩论的一项贡献没有得到应有的重视,这是智囊团《改革》(State)出版的《 2013年国家状况报告》。报告的一方面引起了我的注意。公共服务领导人质疑“中央政府是否评估了福利支出的节省是否会因对本地服务需求的增加而抵消”。我听到全国各地议员和高级官员的忧虑,以及绝大多数人感到中央政府几乎不知道这些变化可能对地方产生什么影响的感觉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2013年第26期|14-14|共1页
  • 作者

    Carolyn Downs;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号