首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Setting council housing free
【24h】

Setting council housing free

机译:释放议会住房

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a growing public sense of crisis in housing, and a belief that the housing market is failing. But there's no swell of public or political support for new council and housing association homes. This is a hard truth for campaigners. The challenge is clear: 'how can we build more homes that families and young people can afford?' Social housing is rarely seen as the answer. Most people now think social housing is like social services, part of the state's safety net for the needy, not homes meant for them or their families. Three decades on from Margaret Thatcher, housing is regarded as a private responsibility, not as an essential public good. Above all, there is a pessimistic fatalism that much can be done about failings in the housing market, or that public housing can play anything but a peripheral part in building the homes our country needs.
机译:公众对住房危机的意识与日俱增,并认为住房市场正在崩溃。但是,对于新的议会和房屋协会房屋,没有任何公共或政治支持。对于竞选者来说,这是一个硬道理。挑战显而易见:“我们如何建造更多家庭和年轻人负担得起的房屋?”社会住房很少被视为答案。现在,大多数人认为社会住房就像社会服务,是该州为有需要的人提供的安全网的一部分,而不是为他们或家人提供的房屋。从撒切尔夫人(Margaret Thatcher)出发的三十年里,住房被视为私人责任,而不是必不可少的公共物品。最重要的是,有一种悲观的宿命论,那就是对住房市场的失败可以做很多事情,或者说,公共住房除了在建设我国需要的住房方面起着外围作用外,还可以发挥其他任何作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2014年第30期|13-13|共1页
  • 作者

    John Healey;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号