首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Funding by results
【24h】

Funding by results

机译:成果资助

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The spectre of the November Spending Review now hangs over us all. True, the chancellor's very publicly-spun desire for non-protected departments to look at cuts of up to 40% is no doubt a precursor to most areas getting a bit less of a reduction than that - alongside a new spin about how the worst has been avoided. Nevertheless, on reading the figures in the July Budget we are in for tough times, with the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies calculating that departments that are not protected by a ring-fence will have to cut over 12% from their budgets over the next five years. How will non-protected services like the police cope? Can free art galleries survive? For how many more years can the public sector recruit good people while pay goes up substantially less than that in the private sector? Can local authorities take a 10% hit to their already much shrunk budgets, let alone a 40% one?
机译:现在,十一月支出审查的幽灵笼罩着我们所有人。没错,财政大臣公开要求非保护部门削减多达40%的减排量,无疑是大多数地区减税幅度均低于此幅度的先兆-以及关于最坏情况发生率的新说法被避免了。不过,在阅读7月份预算中的数据时,我们正处在艰难时期,独立财政研究所计算得出,不受环网保护的部门在接下来的5年中将不得不从预算中削减12%以上年份。警察等不受保护的服务将如何应对?自由美术馆可以生存吗?公共部门可以招聘多少年的优秀人才,而薪水却大大低于私营部门?地方政府是否可以对已经缩水的预算造成10%的损失,更不用说40%的预算了?

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2015年第13期|11-11|共1页
  • 作者

    Dan Corry;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号