首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >A delicate balance
【24h】

A delicate balance

机译:微妙的平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With debate in the sector very much live over the role and extent of commercial investments in councils' financial plans, many delegates to the round table hosted by The MJ and Public Sector Plc's Local Government Council Consortium, described encountering scepticism within their authorities. One said: 'There's a need for a culture change. Certain parties have changed and are anti-commercial. It takes time to change the culture of senior officers as well.' Another agreed: 'All councils have to be careful of political dogma - that shouldn't come into it, but unfortunately it does. We shouldn't be basing decisions on that.' But this is far from a uniform picture. Some authorities have embraced commercialism, mainly to counter financial pressures. 'This trend has been increasing over the years as funding has gone down,' noted one delegate. Another said: 'If we are not business-minded, services either cannot be provided or improved.' One participant revealed: 'Every service knows they have to wash their own faces or they will be outsourced. It's quite brutal. You either buy into the ethos and what we are about, or you work with another authority. We don't let politics get in the way of doing business - we do what's right for our residents.' It is not just among the officers and members where a culture change is under way, but in the electorate as well. One participant told the meeting: 'Since we got into that way of working - maximising the income we generate for a purpose - people have come around to it. When we demonstrate to people what we have done, and that we couldn't do it any other way, people are less afraid of it.' Another added: 'The message that has been portrayed to residents is to invest to save, rather than cut costs. It has been politically driven, to maintain services rather than relying on the revenue support grant.'
机译:由于该部门的争论很大程度上取决于商业投资在议会财务计划中的作用和程度,因此,由MJ和Public Sector Plc的地方政府理事会财团主办的圆桌会议的许多代表表示,他们在当局内部遇到了怀疑。有人说:“有必要改变文化。某些政党已经改变并且是反商业的。改变高级官员的文化也需要时间。”另一位代表同意:“所有议会都必须注意政治教条-不应加入,但不幸的是。我们不应该以此为基础做出决定。”但这远非一成不变。一些当局已经接受商业化,主要是为了应对财务压力。一位代表指出:“多年来,随着资金的减少,这种趋势一直在增加。”另一位代表说:“如果我们不具备业务意识,那么就无法提供或改善服务。”一位参与者透露:“每个服务部门都知道他们必须洗脸,否则他们将被外包。这很残酷。您要么认同这种精神以及我们的宗旨,要么与另一机构合作。我们不会让政治阻碍经商方式-我们会为我们的居民做正确的事。”正在进行文化变革的不仅是官员和成员,还包括选民。一位与会人员在会议上说:“自从我们进入这种工作方式-最大限度地提高了为某个目的而创造的收入以来,人们就纷纷采取行动。当我们向人们展示我们所做的事情,而我们无法以其他方式做到这一点时,人们就会对此感到恐惧。”另一位补充说:“向居民传达的信息是为了节省而不是削减成本进行投资。从政治上讲,它是维持服务而不是依靠收入支持拨款。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2019年第7期|16-17|共2页
  • 作者

    Martin Ford;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号