首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >National Science Foundation Patronage of Social Science, 1970s and 1980s: Congressional Scrutiny, Advocacy Network, and the Prestige of Economics
【24h】

National Science Foundation Patronage of Social Science, 1970s and 1980s: Congressional Scrutiny, Advocacy Network, and the Prestige of Economics

机译:国家科学基金会1970年代和1980年代的社会科学赞助:国会审查,倡导网络和经济学声望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research in the social sciences received generous patronage in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Research was widely perceived as providing solutions to emerging social problems. That generosity came under increased contest in the late 1970s. Although these trends held true for all of the social sciences, this essay explores the various ways by which economists in particular reacted to and resisted the patronage cuts that were proposed in the first budgets of the Reagan administration. Economists' response was three fold: to engage in joint lobbying with other social scientists, to tap into their authority as a respected policy player, and to influence the types of research financed by the patron. With interviews of the former lobbyist for the social scientists, the former director of the Economics program for the National Science Foundation, and a review of the archival records of economists and their scholarly society, we discuss how economists have claimed entitlement to patronage in the closing decades of the twentieth century. We observe a dynamic and productive relationship between politicians and researchers mediated by the National Science Foundation, where civil servants, lobbyist and public minded scientists, and self-serving grantees trade roles.
机译:在1960年代末和1970年代初,社会科学领域的研究得到了慷慨的资助。人们普遍认为研究为新兴社会问题提供了解决方案。在1970年代后期,这种慷慨的竞争日益激烈。尽管这些趋势在所有社会科学中都适用,但是本文探讨了经济学家对里根政府第一批预算中提出的削减赞助做出反应和抵制的各种方式。经济学家的反应有三方面:与其他社会科学家共同游说,发挥他们作为受人尊敬的政策制定者的权威,以及影响赞助人资助的研究类型。通过采访前社会科学家的游说者,国家科学基金会经济学计划的前主任以及对经济学家及其学术社会的档案记录的回顾,我们讨论了经济学家如何在结业时要求获得赞助二十世纪的几十年。我们观察到由美国国家科学基金会(National Science Foundation)调解的政治家与研究人员之间的动态和富有成效的关系,在这些关系中,公务员,说客和具有公众意识的科学家以及自私的受赠人都扮演着贸易角色。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Minerva》 |2012年第4期|423-449|共27页
  • 作者

    Tiago Mata; Tom Scheiding;

  • 作者单位

    Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK;

    Chair, Business Administration Program, College of Business and Management, Cardinal Stritch University, 6801 N. Yates Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53217, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    patronage; history of social science; economics of science; public representations of science;

    机译:惠顾社会科学史;科学经济学;科学的公共代表;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号