首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >'Innovation Studies': Staking the Claim for a New Disciplinary 'Tribe' Ian Fagerberg, Ben R. Martin and Esben Sloth Andersen (eds.), Innovation Studies: Evolution & Future Challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014
【24h】

'Innovation Studies': Staking the Claim for a New Disciplinary 'Tribe' Ian Fagerberg, Ben R. Martin and Esben Sloth Andersen (eds.), Innovation Studies: Evolution & Future Challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014

机译:“创新研究”:争取新学科“部落”的主张Ian Fagerberg,Ben R. Martin和Esben Sloth Andersen(ed。),《创新研究:进化与未来挑战》。牛津大学出版社,牛津,2014年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

If anyone in Victoria's reign had tried to put himself outside the mystique of that society and, from outside, coldly to dissect the word gentleman, we can guess what would have happened to him. Wherever he had found confusion he would have been told 'But of course you can't understand. That is because you yourself are not a gentleman' (Clive Staples Lewis, Studies in Words, 1960). In recent years the phrase "innovation studies" has come to be used by a group of scholars to name what was previously called science and technology studies, then science, technology and innovation studies (the three concepts of the linear model of innovation). What is "innovation studies"? Some years ago Ian Fagerberg and Bart Vespagen produced analyses that "defined" the field by way of bibliometric data (Fagerberg and Verspagen 2009). Now, these same researchers (and others) have produced an argumentation that, in principle, gives a kind of coherence to the field. Innovation Studies: Evolution & Future Challenges is the outcome of a workshop held in 2012 in Aalborg on "The Future of Innovation Studies", to which some additional contributions were added.
机译:如果维多利亚统治时期有人试图让自己脱离那个社会的神秘面纱,并从外面冷漠地剖析“绅士”一词,我们可以猜测他会发生什么。无论他在哪里发现困惑,他都会被告知“但是,您当然无法理解。那是因为你自己不是绅士”(克莱夫·斯台普斯·刘易斯,《言语研究》,1960年)。近年来,一群学者开始使用“创新研究”这个短语来命名以前称为科学技术研究的名称,然后是科学,技术和创新研究的名称(创新线性模型的三个概念)。什么是“创新研究”?几年前,伊恩·法格伯格(Ian Fagerberg)和巴特·维斯帕根(Bart Vespagen)进行了分析,这些分析通过文献计量数据“定义”了该领域(Fagerberg和Verspagen 2009)。现在,这些相同的研究人员(和其他研究人员)提出了一种论点,即从原则上讲,该领域具有某种连贯性。创新研究:进化与未来挑战是2012年在奥尔堡举办的关于“创新研究的未来”的研讨会的成果,并在此基础上增加了一些其他贡献。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Minerva》 |2014年第4期|489-495|共7页
  • 作者

    Benoit Godin;

  • 作者单位

    385, rue Sherbrooke Est Montreal, Quebec H2X 1E3, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号