首页> 外文期刊>Military review >Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Domain Operations A Whole-of-Nation Approach Key to Success
【24h】

Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Domain Operations A Whole-of-Nation Approach Key to Success

机译:人工智能和多领域作战全国范围内的成功

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Americans tend to think of choices in binary, all-or-nothing terms. They also often tend to argue that one choice is better than the other, believing one choice carries less risk or is more efficient. In complex human interactions, it is often difficult to actually gauge this, but cultural predispositions often play a central role. Ironically, iconic movies about rogue AI like The Terminator and The Matrix also play a large role in people's calculation. This leads to an initial distrust of AI (rather than a neutral examination of what AI can offer planners and tacticians) that must be overcome. Another cognitive challenge revolves around confusion regarding where we actually are in AI development. Many sensational articles on the coming singularity, which feed into Terminator fears, are confusing military leaders. When a leader says AI equates to nuclear deterrence, that leader is referring to the potential for two singularities occurring simultaneously. This is a dangerous misconception, as it can cause military and political leaders to discount AI and its weaponization, while our adversaries forge ahead. balance, and perhaps surpass, current U.S. asymmetric advantages on the battlefield. Among America's adversaries, China is at the forefront of both AI development and the weaponization of AI. The U.S. military needs to formally engage with American technological businesses and create a democratic synergy. The U.S. government is not the CCP and it cannot dictate innovation or access to datasets. The military needs to build long-term trust relationships with the developers of AI in order to both allay the fears of Silicon Valley developers and build the understanding and trust of military operators. Leaders value soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines, but replacing some of these individuals will actually make the personnel in the manned platforms safer, more adaptable, and better able to operate in a highly complex and interdependent MDO environment. Embracing a WoN strategy allows the U.S. military to leverage the civilian industries it will need in any future fight.
机译:美国人倾向于以二进制,全部或无论术语的选择。他们还经常倾向于争辩说,一个选择比另一个更好,相信一个选择越来越少的风险或更有效。在复杂的人类相互作用中,实际难以衡量这一点,但文化易感性经常发挥核心作用。具有讽刺意味的是,关于终结者和矩阵的Rogue Ai的标志性电影也在人们的计算中起着很大的作用。这导致了对AI的最初不信任(而不是中立的AI可以提供必须克服的统治者和策略的审查)。另一个认知挑战围绕着我们实际在AI的发展中的混乱。许多关于即将到来的奇点的耸人听闻的文章,它归因于终结者的恐惧,是令人困惑的军事领导人。当领导者说AI等同于核威慑时,该领导者指的是同时出现两个奇点的潜力。这是一个危险的误解,因为它可能导致军事和政治领导人折扣AI及其武器化,而我们的对手伪造成本。平衡,并且可能超过当前的美国。在战场上的不对称优势。在美国的对手中,中国是AI发展和AI武器化的最前沿。美国军方需要正式聘请美国技术企业,并创造民主协同作用。美国政府不是CCP,它不能决定创新或访问数据集。军方需要与AI的开发人员建立长期信任关系,以便厌恶硅谷开发商的恐惧,并建立军事运营商的理解和信任。领导者价值士兵,水手,亚军和海军陆战队,但取代其中一些人实际上将使载人平台的人员更安全,更适应,更能在高度复杂和相互依存的MDO环境中运行。拥抱赢取战略允许美国军队利用其需要在未来任何战斗中所需的平民行业。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Military review》 |2021年第3期|76-91|共16页
  • 作者

    Dan G.Cox;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号