...
首页> 外文期刊>Metal finishing >ENCLOSED VAPOR DEGREASING SYSTEMS
【24h】

ENCLOSED VAPOR DEGREASING SYSTEMS

机译:封闭式蒸气除油系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Historically, vapor degreasing has been the cleaning process of choice for the majority of manufacturers. It is primarily used for batch cleaning of parts in such industries as general metalworking, automotive components, aerospace, and electronics. Vapor degreasing traditionally used CFC-113 and 1,1,1-trichloroethane solvents. Recent developments have forced both manufacturers and chemical companies producing solvent to reexamine current cleaning processes. It was the discovery that these solvents, commonly used in the cleaning process, were responsible for the depletion of the ozone layer that eventually lead to the Montreal Protocol. The Protocol called for a phased withdrawal of these solvents from the world marketplace. In the United States, taxes have been levied on continued use of these solvents and the U.S. EPA now requires warning labels on products that were manufactured using these solvents and placed into commerce. As a result, some solvent manufacturers have announced that they will cease production of these materials. These events have created many problems for manufacturers who rely on the vapor degreasing process. The "magic bullet" (a drop-in replacement solvent) that provides high threshold limit values (TLVs) and the good cleaning characteristics of 1,1,1-trichloroethane and CFC-113 without any ozone-depletion potential does not exist at present. Chemical manufacturers report that if replacements are developed, they will be more costly and perhaps have lower boiling points and lower TLVs. Most chemical companies won't even speculate on when these replacement chemistries might be available. The consensus is, however, that new replacements will not be available before the existing chemistries are phased out. This has mandated industry to seek alternatives to the conventional vapor degreasing process and it must choose from technologies and chemistries that are currently available.
机译:从历史上看,蒸汽脱脂一直是大多数制造商选择的清洁工艺。它主要用于一般金属加工,汽车零部件,航空航天和电子行业等零件的批量清洁。蒸汽脱脂传统上使用的CFC-113和1,1,1-三氯乙烷溶剂。最近的发展迫使制造商和生产溶剂的化学公司重新检查当前的清洁工艺。人们发现,通常在清洁过程中使用的这些溶剂会导致臭氧层的消耗,最终导致《蒙特利尔议定书》的产生。该议定书要求逐步从世界市场上撤回这些溶剂。在美国,已对继续使用这些溶剂征收了税款,并且美国EPA现在要求在使用这些溶剂制造并投放市场的产品上贴上警告标签。结果,一些溶剂制造商宣布将停止生产这些材料。这些事件给依赖于蒸汽脱脂工艺的制造商带来了许多问题。目前不存在提供高阈值极限(TLV)且具有1,1,1-三氯乙烷和CFC-113且无任何臭氧消耗潜能的良好清洁特性的“魔术子弹”(一种替代溶剂) 。化学品制造商报告说,如果开发替代品,它们将更加昂贵,并且沸点和TLV可能更低。大多数化学公司甚至都不会猜测何时可以使用这些替代化学物质。但是,共识是,在淘汰现有化学药品之前,将不会提供新的替代品。这已迫使工业界寻求常规蒸气脱脂方法的替代品,并且它必须从当前可用的技术和化学中选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号