...
首页> 外文期刊>Materials Science and Engineering >Quantitative phase analysis of martensite-bainite steel using EBSD and its microstructure, tensile and high-cycle fatigue behaviors
【24h】

Quantitative phase analysis of martensite-bainite steel using EBSD and its microstructure, tensile and high-cycle fatigue behaviors

机译:使用EBSD的马氏体 - 贝氏体钢的定量相分析及其微观结构,拉伸和高循环疲劳行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study conducted a quantitative analysis of the martensite/bainite (M/B; bainitic structure region) fraction of martensite-bainite steel using electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis. The M/B fraction analyzed using the EBSD analysis method was then compared with phase fraction measurement results with an optical microscope (OM), field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), and field-emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM). In addition, microstructure, tensile and high-cycle fatigue behaviors according to M/B phase fraction were investigated. Initial microstructural observation measured a prior austenite grain size (PAGS) of 24 μm (alloy A) and 11 μm (alloy B). Both alloys were observed to have martensite and bainite structures. XRD phase analysis of the two alloys identified an α-Fe peak expected to be martensite or bainite. Quantitative phase fraction of M/B using EBSD analysis measured M: 40.37% and B: 59.63% for alloy A, and M: 53.03% and B: 46.97% for alloy B. Tensile tests of the above materials confirmed that alloy B, which had finer PAGS and a higher martensite fraction, had greater yield strength (1423 MPa) and tensile strength (1826 MPa) that were approximately 200 MPa higher than alloy A. The yield strength was calculated based on the M/B phase fraction using EBSD and the measured microstructure factors, with a consideration of the prediction model. The calculation value was similar to the actual tested strength one. In the high-cycle fatigue test, alloy B, with its greater strength, had an approximately 200 MPa higher fatigue limit (1075 MPa) than that of alloy A. EBSD analysis of the fatigue crack initiation area confirmed that the M/B interface can act as a fatigue crack initiation site. Based on the above findings, tensile and fracture surface analyses were performed, and attempts were made to identify the tensile and deformation mechanism according to the M/B phase fraction.
机译:该研究通过电子背散射衍射(EBSD)分析对马氏体/贝氏体(M / B;贝氏体结构区域)分数进行了定量分析。然后将使用EBSD分析方法进行分析的M / B级分,与光学显微镜(OM),场发射扫描电子显微镜(FE-SEM)和现场发射透射电子显微镜(FE-TEM)与相位分数测量结果进行比较。另外,研究了根据M / B相级分的微观结构,拉伸和高循环疲劳行为。初始微观结构观察测量了24μm(合金A)和11μm(合金B)的先前奥氏体晶粒尺寸(PAG)。观察到两种合金都有马氏体和贝氏体结构。两种合金的XRD相分析鉴定了预期的α-Fe峰是马氏体或贝氏体。使用EBSD分析的M / B的定量相位测量M:40.37%和B:59.63%的合金A,M:53.03%和B:46.97%用于合金B.上述材料的拉伸试验证实了合金B,哪种具有更高的PAG和更高的马氏体级分,具有更大的屈服强度(1423MPa)和拉伸强度(1826MPa),其约为200mPa高于合金A.屈服强度基于使用EBSD和的M / B相级分计算测量的微观结构因子,考虑到预测模型。计算值类似于实际测试强度。在高循环疲劳试验中,具有较高强度的合金B具有大约200MPa的疲劳极限(1075MPa),而不是合金A的。疲劳裂纹启动区域的EBSD分析证实了M / B界面可以充当疲劳裂纹启动部位。基于上述发现,进行拉伸和断裂表面分析,并进行试图鉴定根据M / B相级分的拉伸和变形机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号